: discuss: EPD CORE OPEN SOURCE LICENSE - Version 0.1
: Thanks to everyone who has contributed suggestions so far.
:
: After further review, we're still not completely happy with the QPL and
: wish to continue revision and discussion on the EPD Core license.
:
: I am posting a V.2 of this license
];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: discuss: EPD CORE OPEN SOURCE LICENSE - Version 0.1
: Thanks to everyone who has contributed suggestions so far.
:
: After further review, we're still not completely happy with the QPL and
: wish to continue revision
Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. scripsit:
Bill,
My overall impression of this version of your license is that it contains
unnecessary provisions, which you could delete given your stated purpose for
the license, but before addressing that I think paragraph 3 needs a little
work to fully establish
Thanks to everyone who has contributed suggestions so far.
After further review, we're still not completely happy with the QPL and
wish to continue revision and discussion on the EPD Core license.
I am posting a V.2 of this license, which has incorporated many of the
changes suggested earlier in
David Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 13 February 2003 09:06 pm, Bill Moran wrote:
[ Please discuss this license. -russ ]
I have attached a license that we are proposing to be OSI compliant.
The license is also posted here:
http://www.potentialtech.com/epdlicense.php
First of all, it would be
Bill Moran scripsit:
All things considered, we could add a clause that explicitly warrants that
we have legal ownership and the legal right to distribute the work, but I
didn't think that was necessary.
All contributors whatever, whether original or otherwise, should warrant
their IP in their
John Cowan wrote:
Bill Moran scripsit:
In the large, this license seems rather close to the QPL. Have you
examined that license for suitability?
Yes, for the most part it seems very similar, but here's where I see
differences:
Our license is designed specifically to respect the rights of
Bill Moran scripsit:
How, exactly, should we approach this? Create a new license that contains
the above verbage, which would be a derivative of the QPL, or is that
overkill? I could simply put the third paragraph in the header of each
distributed file - would that be enough?
IANAL, but it
On Thursday 13 February 2003 09:06 pm, Bill Moran wrote:
[ Please discuss this license. -russ ]
I have attached a license that we are proposing to be OSI compliant.
The license is also posted here:
http://www.potentialtech.com/epdlicense.php
First of all, it would be best if you can craft
9 matches
Mail list logo
