on Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 07:18:28PM -0400, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Your message has engaged my curiosity. Why are discussions about open
source/FSF licenses being held in secret? It seems to me that we all
should be informed of not only the status of these
Does anybody have any information on the status of the next version of the
GPL that I have been hearing rumors about? (Sorry in advance about the
stupid confidentiality banner!)
Laura A. Majerus
Fenwick West LLP
2 Palo Alto Square
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Phone: 650-858-7152
Fax:650-494-1417
on Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:19:56AM -0700, Laura Majerus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Does anybody have any information on the status of the next version of
the GPL that I have been hearing rumors about? (Sorry in advance about
the stupid confidentiality banner!)
The best source of information
odd
to hear that they are an insider on an issue as important as this one is for
the open source movement. Please enlighten us further.
Rod
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: revised GPL?
on Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 07:18:28PM -0400, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Your message has engaged my curiosity. Why are discussions about open
source/FSF licenses being held in secret? It seems to me that we all should
be informed of not only the status of these
5 matches
Mail list logo