Re: Test

2001-05-01 Thread Randy Kramer
David, Thanks for the response! Unfortunately, I threw my bounce message before I saw your note. I may be wrong, but those message numbers (3172 and 3173) sure sound familiar. Next time I get a bounce message I'll record the numbers and then post them on the list. I thought it was a

Re: Test

2001-05-01 Thread Toon Knapen
David Johnson wrote: On Monday 30 April 2001 19:44, Karsten M. Self wrote: There are a few bad eggs subscribed to either this list or FSB whose mailers bounce back to me. I'll report if I get any bounces from this post. If it helps, the messages that got bounced for me were 3172

Re: Test

2001-05-01 Thread Brian Behlendorf
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Randy Kramer wrote: (What's the FSB?) These few bad eggs -- can we do anything about them? On another list I subscribe to something similar happens occasionally. The list administrator tries to contact the bad eggs and if he gets no response he unsubscribes them. The

Newbie questions...

2001-05-01 Thread Ben Sawyer
Hi, I have a few potentially newbie questions I'm trying to sort out for writing a license. I've read as many of the licenses that I could find and I'm now overflowing with information. So I'm at the point of trying to clarify a few things. I have a project where we would like to publish the

Re: Newbie questions...

2001-05-01 Thread John Cowan
Ben Sawyer wrote: I have a project where we would like to publish the source code to the project however we would like to restrict commercial redistribution or use of any kind by its users. Specifically we don't want the following to occur: Okay. Be aware that such software cannot be

Re: Test

2001-05-01 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Brian Behlendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, given that two messages bounced for a large number of people, I would wager that the problem was actually on the mail server side - a temporarily down DNS server perhaps, or resource problems, or what have you - and since they only affected two