On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Kenneth Stephen wrote:
Has this list already discussed the Plan 9 license (
http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/plan9dist/license.html )? If so, could
someone tell me whether it is considered open-sources or point me to the
relevent messages in the archives (is there an
I believe there is no reasonable dispute that OpenMotif, a licensed
version of Motif for use with open-source systems, is not itself
open source: it clearly steps on criteria 1, 8, and 9 of the OSD,
as the Open Group themselves concede. RMS believes it is not free software,
either, and I think
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, John Cowan wrote:
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Kenneth Stephen wrote:
Has this list already discussed the Plan 9 license (
http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/plan9dist/license.html )? If so, could
someone tell me whether it is considered open-sources or point me to the
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Kenneth Stephen wrote:
Has this list already discussed the Plan 9 license (
http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/plan9dist/license.html )? If so, could
someone tell me whether it is considered open-sources or point me to the
relevent messages in the archives (is there an web
-Original Message-
From: pgmr [mailto:pgmr]On Behalf Of Kenneth Stephen
Has this list already discussed the Plan 9 license (
http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/plan9dist/license.html )? If so, could
someone tell me whether it is considered open-sources or point me to the
relevent
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, John Cowan wrote:
RMS writes (copied here under a claim of fair use):
Here are some of the problems of the Motif license:
It claims that you accept the license merely by "using" Motif. Only
a shrink-wrap license or something similar can do that, and
David Johnson writes:
There is an archive at "http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi/3 ".
After a quick check, it is still there, but is a month behind.
Sorry about that, I had an incorrect pathname. Mail was being
archived, but not made available via the web interface.
--
-russ nelson
7 matches
Mail list logo
