Hi,
Do programs compiled with a GNU compiler have to be open
source?
Thanks,
Nathan
No but you have to look at the licenses for the libraries thay you use. They
may have restrictions.
David Simon
Senior Counsel
Phone 408 765 8244
Cell 408 464 2533
Fax 408 765 1621
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Do programs compiled with a GNU compiler have to be open
source?
Absolutely not.
Thanks,
Nathan
--
John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
Does anybody have any information on the status of the next version of the
GPL that I have been hearing rumors about? (Sorry in advance about the
stupid confidentiality banner!)
Laura A. Majerus
Fenwick West LLP
2 Palo Alto Square
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Phone: 650-858-7152
Fax:650-494-1417
Do programs compiled with a GNU compiler have to be open
source?
No! There are commercial projects made with GNU compilers which aren't open
source. But be careful if you use more than only the plain compiler, some
libs, for example, may have different licenses.
I hope this response is helpful
Nupedia Open Content Encyclopedia aims to be a general purpose
encyclopedia, a true multi-national effort to generate a high
quality, unbiased, and *free* Encyclopedia.
I would like to invite people to read and critique the
Nupedia Open Content License, which you may read at:
on Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:19:56AM -0700, Laura Majerus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Does anybody have any information on the status of the next version of
the GPL that I have been hearing rumors about? (Sorry in advance about
the stupid confidentiality banner!)
The best source of information
Your message has engaged my curiosity. Why are discussions about open
source/FSF licenses being held in secret? It seems to me that we all should
be informed of not only the status of these discussions, but also the folks
who are doing 'the discussing.' I know IBM has a license, but it seems
on Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 07:18:28PM -0400, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Your message has engaged my curiosity. Why are discussions about open
source/FSF licenses being held in secret? It seems to me that we all should
be informed of not only the status of these
On Saturday 28 October 2000 01:43 pm, Jimmy Wales wrote:
The only restriction on use and reuse that we seek, and I hope
that this is consistent with Open Source ideals, is that when
people use the content on the web, they are required to provide
a hypertext link back to the original project.
10 matches
Mail list logo