Paul Guyot wrote:
- The text contains a large number of diacriticals
(in the french sections). Though I liked the
bilingual version, my browser died while trying
to print it. Please consider using egrave;
eacute; etc. for the characters with diacritics.
Both versions are
Paul Guyot wrote:
The idea of applying the license to itself seems
a clever one, but is incompatible with allowing
modifications to the licensed work.
I wonder why. Could you please develop, either regarding Draft 1
(always interesting) or the newer Draft 2?
--
Paul,
If modifications
begin DeBug quotation:
I have subscribed to the list hoping to talk with the people who care
most about free software but at the moment i am disappointed.
Well, that's because you're on the wrong list.
This list exists to discuss specific licences with an eye to reviewing
them as part of
On 11/11/01 12:00 AM, Paul Guyot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Still on Sunday morning issues.
I have an interpretation of the GPL and I would love to be proved
wrong because it makes the use of a lot of open source code
impossible on NewtonOS.
[big snip]
I can't really speak to
I had some of your concerns with CodeWarrior and wrote directly to the FSF
who told me that they had no problem with my releasing GPL'ed CodeWarrior
code that used PowerPlant. Their point was that anyone else with CodeWarrior
could compile it. They also allow MFC in GPLed code.
Wait. Let's say
Paul Guyot scripsit:
You seem to refer to the GPL's section 2 about combined works. It
seems to say that A+B would then be released under the GPL, but the
mere part A of A+B is still under the BSD.
Indeed.
The problem is that A+B is a derivative work (in the meaning of the
Berne
6 matches
Mail list logo
