On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Stevan Harnad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (4) PUBLIC ACCESS VS. PUBLIC DOMAIN: AUTHORSHIP, CREDIT, PLAGIARISM,
> PRIORITY, TEXT-INTEGRITY. I don't fully understand the notion of
> making one's writing "public domain" instead of retaining copyright,
> but if that puts either
Mário Amado Alves wrote:
Mark Rafn wrote:
Fundamentally, if the client is open-source, it can be
modified, and the
modified version can LIE and say it's the original version. Anything
which prevents this is not open-source.
?!
Many (most?, all?) open source licenses require authorsh
John Cowan wrote:
> Wilhelm Svenselius scripsit:
>
> > 6. Products derived from or containing any part of the
> Software must
> > be licensed as a whole at NO CHARGE to all third parties under the
> > terms of this license.
>
> The trouble with this clause is that it makes it doubtful
> wheth
Wilhelm Svenselius scripsit:
> 6. Products derived from or containing any part of the Software must be
> licensed as a whole at NO CHARGE to all third parties under the terms of
> this license.
The trouble with this clause is that it makes it doubtful whether the
software can be put on CD-ROMs t
4 matches
Mail list logo