Re: [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts?

2014-06-10 Thread Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz
Free / open source software like freedom, not like free beer :-) No FOSS license prohibits making some money out of all the work done... P-E 2014-06-10 7:51 GMT+02:00 ChanMaxthon xcvi...@me.com: I believe it is perfectly fine. RMS himself even *encourage* that. Sent from my iPhone On Jun

Re: [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts?

2014-06-10 Thread jonathon
On 6/9/2014 10:11 PM, ldr ldr wrote: Yes, FullContentRSS is an AGPL3 script, you can use and/or modify the script as you want. However you can get the script for $20. Is that congruent with the AGPL3 license? Yes. The primary reason most FLOSS is distributed gratis, is because FLOSS

Re: [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts?

2014-06-10 Thread David Woolley
On 10/06/14 06:51, ChanMaxthon wrote: I believe it is perfectly fine. RMS himself even *encourage* that. I think people are missing the point here. Assuming the requestor has used the service, this is a clear violation of clause 13 of the AGPL, and, if allowed would make the AGPL

Re: [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts?

2014-06-10 Thread Kuno Woudt
Hi, On 10-06-14 16:10, David Woolley wrote: On 10/06/14 06:51, ChanMaxthon wrote: I believe it is perfectly fine. RMS himself even *encourage* that. I think people are missing the point here. Assuming the requestor has used the service, this is a clear violation of clause 13 of the AGPL,