On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Tzeng, Nigel H. nigel.tz...@jhuapl.edu wrote:
I'm trying to find an appropriate licensing strategy
for our company, and I'm expressly trying to prevent
and understand the sort of shims that seem to be
standard industry practice. If our work can't be
protected
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Rick Moen r...@linuxmafia.com wrote:
Quoting Henrik Ingo (henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi):
On this topic there are many opinions out there and little case law,
but personally I've always thought that if the FSF as the author of
the GPL thinks something
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
In that, the only way the opinion of the license's author really seems to
factor into things once the license has already been written is as a
contribution to the common understanding of the license. For that
purpose,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:35 PM, John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote:
do not belong in a first-class list here in 2012. Apache fills the
same purpose[1] (permissive license) while being better drafted and
properly handling patents.
Without getting into other issues, I'd hope we can
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Bruce Perens br...@perens.com wrote:
On 06/10/2012 10:49 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
I believe this is entirely consistent with what I said, Bruce. You even
said 'Read caselaw.'
I think we need to come to grips to the fact that it may be possible for GPL
software
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Bruce Perens br...@perens.com wrote:
On 06/11/2012 12:18 AM, Henrik Ingo wrote:
To be clear, NuSphere did not embed MySQL in their product, rather they
embedded closed source components into MySQL
Per Eben's testimony, the Gemini storage engine, using
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Johnny Solbu joh...@solbu.net wrote:
On Friday 17 August 2012 02:15, Russ Nelson wrote:
but it's clear that OSI
Approved Open Source contributions from people who live in countries
that claim Moral Rights is inferior to people who live in countries
which
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Henrik Ingo henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Johnny Solbu joh...@solbu.net wrote:
On Friday 17 August 2012 02:15, Russ Nelson wrote:
but it's clear that OSI
Approved Open Source contributions from people who live in countries
Hi fred
I think what you are asking for guidance on, is outside the mandate of osi,
and fsf too. The time delayed license should of
On 14 Aug 2013 19:24, fred trotter fred.trot...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am sending this to both FSF and OSI people. Please tolerate
my use of the various
license is then outside the osi
mandate to support, and off topic for this list.
Henrik
On 14 Aug 2013 20:40, Henrik Ingo henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi wrote:
Hi fred
I think what you are asking for guidance on, is outside the mandate of
osi, and fsf too. The time delayed license should of
On 14
proposal relates to balancing business vs Open Source
community interests.
I am asking this mailing list for help crafting a proprietary license. It
is certainly ironic but not at all off-topic.
-FT
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Henrik Ingo
henrik.i...@avoinelama.fiwrote:
Sorry
That's an interesting angle to bite on...
Does the US government grant itself patents, and if so, what does it do
with those patents?
On 3 May 2014 06:45, Richard Fontana font...@sharpeleven.org wrote:
On Fri, 02 May 2014 14:55:55 -0500
Karl Fogel kfo...@red-bean.com wrote:
This thread on
The analoguous explanation for why cc0 didn't qualify is that it explicitly
said you get rights a and b but not c, with c a necessary right to copy
and use the software. It should be obvious that - even if you'd disagree
wrt patents - at least for some values of c that is clearly not open source.
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Richard Fontana
font...@sharpeleven.org wrote:
On Sat, 3 May 2014 22:07:19 +0300
Henrik Ingo henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi wrote:
Does the US government grant itself patents,
Yes.
and if so, what does it
do with those patents?
Many are licensed
www.openlife.cc
My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
nrik
--
henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi
+358-40-5697354skype: henrik.ingoirc: hingo
www.openlife.cc
My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
reasonable compensation; and
>
>
>
> · Explicitly preserve the ability of users to assert fair use for uses
> of orphan works.
>
>
>
> "Orphan Works and Mass Digitization":
> http://copyright.gov/orphan/reports/o
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Michael R. Bernstein
<mich...@fandomhome.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Henrik Ingo <henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi>
> wrote:
>> This is interesting indeed. This is so unusual that I have to ask:
>> what is the politic
Cheers!
> Sean
>
>
> ___
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss@opensource.org
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
>
>
--
henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi
+358-
like your name! In my ancestral line some hundred years ago
there was a sequence of men called Mikkel. And they were of course
farmers. One was even called Mikkel Mikkelsson, as his father was
Mikkel too.
--
henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi
+358-40-5697354skype: henrik.ingoirc: hingo
www.openlife
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Tzeng, Nigel H. <nigel.tz...@jhuapl.edu> wrote:
> On 12/6/16, 3:33 PM, "henrik.i...@gmail.com on behalf of Henrik Ingo"
> <henrik.i...@gmail.com on behalf of henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi> wrote:
>>The question isn't abou
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Rick Moen <r...@linuxmafia.com> wrote:
> Quoting Henrik Ingo (henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi):
>
>> Good to remember that CC0 is not an OSI approved open source license,
>> precisely because it did not grant a patent license.
>
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Tzeng, Nigel H. <nigel.tz...@jhuapl.edu> wrote:
> On 12/5/16, 6:55 AM, "License-discuss on behalf of Henrik Ingo"
> <license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org on behalf of
> henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi> wrote:
>>On Fri, Dec 2, 2
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Lawrence Rosen <lro...@rosenlaw.com> wrote:
> Henrik Ingo wrote:
>
> MIT is on record as saying that the MIT license, which is otherwise
> equivalent to the 2-clause BSD license, does *not* grant a patent license.
I just wanted to catch
rtant decision-making
> factor, which made the idea plausible, but non-copyleft factors matter much
> more than I once thought, and make simplifying to a "wizard" too hard for
> OSI (though perhaps still plausible for a third party).
> Documentation of what the copyleft spectrum is, what the key licenses on it
> are, and what other factors might be relevant, is still a good idea, but are
> secondary to getting the basic lists right.
>
> HTH-
>
> Luis
>
>
> ___
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss@opensource.org
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
>
--
henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi
+358-40-5697354skype: henrik.ingoirc: hingo
www.openlife.cc
My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
i
+358-40-5697354skype: henrik.ingoirc: hingo
www.openlife.cc
My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
t; Website: www.opensource.org
> ___
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss@opensource.org
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
--
henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi
+358-40-5697354
b site, http://www.solbu.net
> PGP key ID: 0x4F5AD64DFA687324
>
> ___
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss@opensource.org
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
>
--
henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi
+358-40-5697354skype: henrik.ingo
__
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss@opensource.org
> https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
>
--
henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi
+358-40-5697354skype: henrik.ingoirc: hingo
www.openlife.cc
My LinkedIn p
will still have both the warranty and whatever
patent license may be implied by the short ISC license.
henrik
--
henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi
+358-40-5697354skype: henrik.ingoirc: hingo
www.openlife.cc
My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linke
31 matches
Mail list logo
