as such.
IANAL and as per normal if someone else can point me to a project with
similar scope and aims I will be happy to withdraw my project (I am
sure Monty would do the same, assuming his aims were met)...
Thanks,
-FT
--
Fred Trotter
Blog: http://radar.oreilly.com/fredt
Twitter: https
, and off topic for this list.
Henrik
On 14 Aug 2013 20:40, Henrik Ingo henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi wrote:
Hi fred
I think what you are asking for guidance on, is outside the mandate of
osi, and fsf too. The time delayed license should of
On 14 Aug 2013 19:24, fred trotter fred.trot...@gmail.com
to limit the licenses that would be supported under the
time delay model to a limited set... to discourage License Proliferation
the way the Google Stance did at one time:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License_proliferation#Google.27s_stance
--
Fred Trotter
Blog: http://radar.oreilly.com/fredt
of the adage may be, the point for us is that none
of this has anything to do with licensing. Fred Trotter was actually
asking a question, to which the correct answer is: You don't need a
license to make something free software at a certain date in the
future. Giving a copy to an appropriate
to translate the abstract discussion into todo
list items...
-FT
--
Fred Trotter
Blog: http://radar.oreilly.com/fredt
Twitter: https://twitter.com/fredtrotter
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org
5 matches
Mail list logo
