RE: Interesting Microsoft license clause re open source

2001-06-25 Thread Lou Grinzo
This is bordering on the bizarre, IMO. I bet the lawyers will have a field day deciding what in conjunction with means. (On the same disk? Dynamically linked? Statically linked? In the same archive, even if it's unrelated software? From the same ftp directory?) In more general terms I'm

RE: Interesting Microsoft license clause re open source

2001-06-25 Thread Lou Grinzo
Thanks, guys. I didn't mean to get off on a tangent with the pancakes and blue socks thing. But the more important issues, I think, is what's up with MS and this in conjunction with phrasing. I can't believe that MS's lawyers don't realize how vague that statement is, which makes it sound

RE: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent

2001-03-30 Thread Lou Grinzo
When you get it, pls. post the information to the list, if you can do so legally and without ruffling too many feathers. Should make for some interesting reading. g Take care, Lou -Original Message- From: Laura Majerus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 2:41 PM

RE: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent

2001-03-29 Thread Lou Grinzo
al Message- From: Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 2:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent "Lou Grinzo" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My solution is for some group of people (like us) to collectively assem

RE: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent

2001-03-29 Thread Lou Grinzo
OTECTED] Subject: RE: Subscription/Service Fees - OSD Intent Lou Grinzo wrote: I've contended for a long time that the primary problem with open/free licenses is that they're not specific enough. My experience (as a lawyer) with open/free licenses is that many of them are not properly d

RE: The Toll Roads of Open Source

2001-01-23 Thread Lou Grinzo
perspective. It's time for everyone involved to take a deep breath, step back from the keyboard, and think about something non-work related for a few minutes. Take care, Lou Grinzo Editor, LinuxProgramming.com -Original Message- From: dan [mailto:dan]On Behalf Of Dan Hensgen Sent: Tuesday

RE: Cherry-picking license proposals

2001-01-21 Thread Lou Grinzo
d go back to waiting for the license I submitted (Open Compatibility License) to be discussed. Take care, Lou Grinzo Editor, LinuxProgramming.com

RE: Cherry-picking license proposals

2001-01-20 Thread Lou Grinzo
to the material, unless specifically asked for advice. Take care, Lou Grinzo Editor, LinuxProgramming.com

RE: OSI compliance requiring software to be free beer?

2001-01-18 Thread Lou Grinzo
. And no, I don't have a solution to this situation, either, or I'd be an absurdly rich man, as Russell suggested. g Take care, Lou Grinzo Editor, LinuxProgramming.com -Original Message- From: Russell Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 11:30 AM To: Manfred Schmid

Free beer, free speech, etc.

2001-01-18 Thread Lou Grinzo
"Sun Community License" leaps to mind... g) Take care, Lou Grinzo Editor, LinuxProgramming.com

RE: Qt and the GPL

2000-09-05 Thread Lou Grinzo
This latest exchange points out one of the most troubling aspects of software licensing--even many of the people who care about such issues and closely read the licenses can't always agree on exactly what is and isn't allowed. In this case, I think it would help everyone a great deal if the FSF