^^^
documentation files...
^^^
--
Mark Shewmaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
a patent license via the Apache license
through an Apache-GPL'd work, then..it looks to me like Apache
requirements are still holding, and that the work is not just limited by
GPL requirements.
--
Mark Shewmaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 10:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Shewmaker scripsit:
Person_B is also stuck--he can't distribute Program_B under the
GPL anymore to anyone, because he's not allowed to distribute
it to Person_C due to a lack of a patent license for Patent_A.
Sure he can
; IANAL still applies of
course, and I'm still assuming there aren't weird corner cases going on
with IP ownership disputes and such.)
(Side issue: I just read John Cowan's very similar but impressively far
more concise response. I've got to learn to write more concisely!)
--
Mark Shewmaker
confused on some
basic points somewhere, but it seems to me as if your rewording would
really change things.)
-Mark Shewmaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
in a way compatible with the
public goals of the GPLv3 in this area and only lose a comparative
handful of modifications?
-Mark Shewmaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
license proliferation we've
seen to also occur in the world of patent licenses.
-Mark Shewmaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.openpatents.org/
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
would be better than one that only addresses
Open Source concerns, both because it includes everyone who is (wrongly)
harmed by software patents, and because it includes everyone who might
be interested in spending time, money, and patents to help solve the
problem via cross-licensing.
-Mark Shewmaker
t of legal help on the idea, I haven't gotten legal help
on the written license itself so far. I'm sure it currently has
holes all over the place--it's still very much a work in progress.)
-Mark Shewmaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
otherboard.) Hardware licensing
discussions on the openppc mailing list have tended to be more specific
to computer hardware, and not immediately applicable to your case above,
but they should still prove helpful.
-Mark Shewmaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo
