Bruce, thanks for your comments. My replies are inserted below. /Larry
Rosen
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 7:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Academic Free License version 2.0
I think
10:05 PM
Subject: Academic Free License version 2.0
To License-Discuss (and others interested persons on BCC):
Version 2.0 of the Academic Free License (AFL) is hereby
submitted for
your review and for the approval of the OSI Board of
Directors. It can
be found at http://rosenlaw.com/afl2.0
Lawrence E. Rosen wrote:
Therefore, the new AFL is identical to the OSL except that the AFL does
not contain a reciprocity provision. A redlined comparison of AFL2.0
and OSL2.0 is at http://rosenlaw.com/afl2.0-redline.pdf. When you
suggest changes to the AFL, please consider how that language
Lawrence E. Rosen scripsit:
Version 2.0 of the Academic Free License (AFL) is hereby submitted for
your review and for the approval of the OSI Board of Directors. It can
be found at http://rosenlaw.com/afl2.0.html.
This license is obviously open source, a big win, and it's nice that it
these licenses.
In the meantime, I encourage you to think about using the Academic Free
License version 2.0 instead of the BSD, MIT and Apache licenses, and
their variants, that have proliferated on OSI's approved license list.
/Lawrence Rosen
Rosenlaw Einschlag, a technology law firm
General counsel
5 matches
Mail list logo
