KDE violates IBM patent

2004-06-11 Thread dlw
On June 8, 2004 IBM was awarded a patent for: A Caps Lock notification method, system, mechanism, algorithm, and computer program product. A determination is made as to whether a Caps Lock key of a computer keyboard is in an error state, based on ascertaining whether a first condition has been

Re: KDE violates IBM patent

2004-06-11 Thread Robert Osfield
if (caps_lock_on) { beep(0.5); printf(Your caps lock is on.\n); } So this infringes on a IBM patent. great I hope IBM employees are thrilled about working for such an innovative and forward looking company. Robert. On Friday 11 June 2004 14:52, you wrote: On June 8, 2004

Re: KDE violates IBM patent

2004-06-11 Thread Marius Amado Alves
Isn't there a procedure to request revoking patents? Shouldn't the FOSS community unite to file such requests against stupid patents? Or do the the antipatent provisions of certain FOSS licenses completely take care of this? Thanks. -- license-discuss archive is at

Re: KDE violates IBM patent

2004-06-11 Thread Alexander Terekhov
Where do we go to get our license? http://www.ibm.com/ibm/licensing/contact I'd guess. regards, alexander. -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

Re: KDE violates IBM patent

2004-06-11 Thread Ruth A. Kramer
Robert Osfield wrote: if (caps_lock_on) { beep(0.5); printf(Your caps lock is on.\n); } So this infringes on a IBM patent. great I hope IBM employees are thrilled about working for such an innovative and forward looking company. I am not trying to defend IBM or this

Re: KDE violates IBM patent

2004-06-11 Thread Marius Amado Alves
It seems to me that should be enough prior art to kill this patent. Clearly there is. But is this fact sufficient to protect someone (re)deploying the mechanism? Or must the patent be revoked in some way prior to that? I mean, suppose I deploy the mechanism and IBM puts me in court. Can the

Re: KDE violates IBM patent

2004-06-11 Thread Arnoud Engelfriet
Marius Amado Alves wrote: It seems to me that should be enough prior art to kill this patent. Clearly there is. But is this fact sufficient to protect someone (re)deploying the mechanism? Or must the patent be revoked in some way prior to that? US patents are presumed valid. A court will

Re: KDE violates IBM patent

2004-06-11 Thread Steven Noels
On 11 Jun 2004, at 15:52, dlw wrote: Recent versions of KDE infringe this patent at the log-in screen. Where do we go to get our license? And Mac OSX shows a CapsLock symbol in the password entry field of the logon screen as well. :-) /Steven -- Steven Noels

Re: KDE violates IBM patent

2004-06-11 Thread Robin 'Roblimo' Miller
I wrote a fast, rather tongue-in-cheek story about this. The few quotes used were with permission: http://business.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=04/06/11/179255 Thanks, everyone. - Robin 'Roblimo' Miller Editor in Chief, OSDN -- license-discuss archive is at

Re: KDE violates IBM patent

2004-06-11 Thread Ruth A. Kramer
Robin 'Roblimo' Miller wrote: I wrote a fast, rather tongue-in-cheek story about this. The few quotes used were with permission: http://business.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=04/06/11/179255 Good article! Thanks for the feedback! regards, Randy Kramer -- license-discuss archive is at