on Tue, Feb 19, 2002, Matthew C. Weigel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 08:29 p, Topper, Anthony wrote:
We understand the desire to have one Common Public License with
no messy
variations. We think it is an excellent license, hence our desire
for our own
To all concerned,
Effective immediately, Network Appliance retracts our previous request for
License approval from the OSI for the Network Appliance Common Public License.
We erred. Upon re-review we had earlier missed the clause in the common public
license that declares a copyright with IBM
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 08:29 p, Topper, Anthony wrote:
We understand the desire to have one Common Public License with
no messy
variations. We think it is an excellent license, hence our desire
for our own small variation of it. The issue that had our
attorney's concerned was
3 matches
Mail list logo