on Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 10:28:00AM -0500, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I agree that open source must win this thing, but thinking like a
lawyer matters too...no need to chase false hopes or expend resources
hopelessly.
I'm not saying that legal rigor doesn't matter, and
True, the potential impacts of U.S. litigation -expense- and -duration-
shouldn't be ignored, if one wants to speculate re. the outcome and/or re. the
interim tactical aspects of SCO v. IBM (and the IBM v. SCO counterclaims). (Those
factors can be huge. I often use documentation of U.S.
on Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:38:42AM -0800, Lawrence E. Rosen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:41 AM, Mahesh T. Pai wrote:
Could not any of the copyright holders to the Linux Kernel sources
(I understand that there are several, since Linus does not
seek
A bit off topic; but I guess that people on this list have the
interest, resources and the capacity, to implement what I have in
mind, if it can be done at all.
Please see the following extract from the Indian Copyright Act.
begin quote
60. Remedy in the case of groundless
Of
Mahesh T. Pai
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:41 AM
To: License Discuss
Subject: OFF-TOPIC - The SCO suit
A bit off topic; but I guess that people on this list
have the interest, resources and the capacity, to
implement what I have in mind, if it can be done at all.
Please
5 matches
Mail list logo
