Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. scripsit:
There is also the questionable premise that a software license may
lawfully extinguish the floor and ceiling of derivative works...i.e. under
copyright law some modifications need no permission from the copyright
holder because they are fair uses, other
From: Rod Dixon [mailto:rod;cyberspaces.org]
there is a lot being said here. To clarify one point at a
time, the use of derivative work should be in the copyright
law sense, not an unusual meaning gleamed from a
license...whether it is the MPL or any other license. In this
respect, the
We're not connecting here. My point is that
derivative work as used in the copyright statute is
an unclear term. And that the definition of
derivative work varies among jurisdictions. And that
the MPL does not, as Larry suggests, use a derivative
work standard for precisely that reason.
I
; Dave Nelson; OpenSource Licensing Discussion Group
Subject: RE: Procedure for using an approved license
Open Source friends,
I've been looking at MPL 1.1 as well. One of the reasons I would
replace the word Netscape with my own company name is #6.2:
6.2. Effect of New Versions.
Once Covered
-
From: David Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 10:03 PM
To: Dave Nelson; OpenSource Licensing Discussion Group
Subject: Re: Procedure for using an approved license
On Sunday 06 October
understanding this too!
James
-Original Message-
From: David Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 10:03 PM
To: Dave Nelson; OpenSource Licensing Discussion Group
Subject: Re: Procedure for using an approved license
On Sunday 06 October 2002 02:10 pm, Dave
Subject: RE: Procedure for using an approved license
Open Source friends,
I've been looking at MPL 1.1 as well. One of the reasons I
would replace the word Netscape with my own company name is #6.2:
6.2. Effect of New Versions.
Once Covered Code has been published under a particular
I wish to use the Mozilla 1.1 license, but don't know the exact
procedures here.
I copied the Mozilla 1.1 license from your site, replace 'Netscape' with
my company, and 'Mozilla' with my product, and Netscape trademarks with
mine. No other changes were made. Then added a line under the title
On Sunday 06 October 2002 02:10 pm, Dave Nelson wrote:
I wish to use the Mozilla 1.1 license, but don't know the exact
procedures here.
I copied the Mozilla 1.1 license from your site, replace 'Netscape' with
my company, and 'Mozilla' with my product, and Netscape trademarks with
mine. No
For what it's worth, so far Netscape has been very responsible and careful
about not making ad-hoc changes to their license. Look at the trouble
they've been going to recently, to try and get all of their code
MPL/GPL/LGPL tri-licensed. It would have been easy to take advantage of
their right
Nelson; OpenSource Licensing Discussion Group
Subject: RE: Procedure for using an approved license
Open Source friends,
I've been looking at MPL 1.1 as well. One of the reasons I
would replace the word Netscape with my own company name is #6.2:
6.2. Effect of New Versions.
Once Covered
11 matches
Mail list logo
