To OSI License Discussion subscribers,
From: Robert Samuel White [EMAIL PROTECTED],
From: Karsten M. Self [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Larry, I can't afford an attorney, as you already know. And I cannot
use one of the existing licenses because it does not feel right to me
to do so.
These are
on Tue, Oct 08, 2002, Robert Samuel White ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Larry, I can't afford an attorney, as you already know. And I cannot
use one of the existing licenses because it does not feel right to me
to do so.
These are constraints imposed by you. You're welcome to live with the
,
outdated?
Refer to the original post with this same subject line.
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:38 PM
To: Robert Samuel White
Subject: Re: Simplified Artistic License [osd]
To Robert Samuel White,
From: Robert
- First and foremost, I want a license which is less
complicated than the existing licenses.
You're entitled to that, but we've warned you to consult an attorney.
Complexity is related to enforceability. Attorneys will almost
certainly not recommend your license to their clients because it
believe that this discussion has long reached its
usefulness and should be ended now.
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence E. Rosen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 3:45 PM
To: 'Robert Samuel White'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Simplified Artistic License [osd
Okay, here is the license modified to (hopefully) meet full OSD
compliance. It is available here as well:
http://enetwizard.sourceforge.net/license.html.
Below is also the license as a template, which is what I would request
for approval.
eNetwizard Content Management Server License
6 matches
Mail list logo
