Hi Russel,
It's with my laywers now. Let's see what they have to say.
His initial impressions, and mine, seem to be that regardless of
whether you apporve or disapprove of a 'rant', if the licence upholds
the principles of free software then it is certifiable.
we'll see what mr fancy-pants
dave sag writes:
We state
4. The term pronoic should be used to endorse and promote products derived
from this software before obtaining written permission. For written
permission, you must contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave, we have been asked to approve political
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 9:59 pm, dave sag wrote:
The intent of clause 4 is that people are encouraged to think about
and to describe their work as being pronoic, ie as being part of a
greater conspiracy to make life better. we encourage developers do
this before, or if ever, seeking
Hi OSSL experts,
In my earlier posts to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I failed to
follow protocol and snagged myself on a couple of silly
misunderstandings. For this I apologise.
I have now followed from the list at
http://www.opensource.org/docs/certification_mark.html and hope that
this meets with
4 matches
Mail list logo
