Quoting Clark C. Evans (c...@clarkevans.com):
I think MySQL AB's licensing strategy is offered in this
forum as an overreach. In particular, Larry Rosen argues
that there is no derived work when an application simply
uses MySQL as intended via its public interface, even if
the
Rick Moen scripsit:
MySQL AB's sales staff is reputed to have made claims to customers
that were insupportable. (Whether that thus constitutes a licensing
strategy I would not know, but I'm generally not quite that cynical.)
Maybe not, but lying to your customers is definitely a *business*
Good answer, John!
Same with me, deceniums agao, at GEISCO (General Electric Information
Services).
But you do *never know* what the future does bring ...
** unless you actively do try to INFLUENCE it (the future of human
beeings) **
Watch me at Thomas.Schneider.Wien, at FaceBook, Skype,
John,
Thank you for your reply.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011, at 11:18 AM, John Cowan wrote:
Does the GPL prevent the distribution of M if the
work it relies upon, P, isn't compatibly licensed?
Web browsers rely on web servers to provide most of their function
(take it from someone who was
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Tzeng, Nigel H. nigel.tz...@jhuapl.edu wrote:
I'm trying to find an appropriate licensing strategy
for our company, and I'm expressly trying to prevent
and understand the sort of shims that seem to be
standard industry practice. If our work can't be
protected
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Clark C. Evans c...@clarkevans.com wrote:
First, thank everyone for their responses. I especially
enjoy the reading material that Rick Moen has referenced.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Tzeng, Nigel H. wrote:
If it's not a derivative work then it's not a
6 matches
Mail list logo
