Those CC licenses are indeed interchangeable l10ns, if it have the same
properties. They also have special clause in the licenses to permit
interchanging l10ns of the license in the actual legal code. Example: CC-by 3.0
China (in Simplified Chinese, on top of Chinese laws) versus CC-by 3.0
The links you included points to Chinese explanation of Unported license, not
the localized license itself. An example: CC-by-sa 3.0 China
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/cn/ this is the localized one.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013年10月21日, at 21:29, David Woolley
Problem: Chinese court generally require licenses be written in Chinese
language. So still, I need some mechanism to make l10n work.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013年10月21日, at 22:34, Luis Villa l...@lu.is wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:29 AM, David Woolley for...@david-woolley.me.uk
wrote:
).
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013年10月21日, at 23:21, Luis Villa l...@lu.is wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:17 AM, ChanMaxthon xcvi...@me.com wrote:
What I am trying here is to add similar clauses into open source licenses
for software, making it similarly localizable. I will also include
I believe it is perfectly fine. RMS himself even *encourage* that.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 10, 2014, at 13:11, ldr ldr stackoverflowuse...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is an excerpt from the response I received:
Yes, FullContentRSS is an AGPL3 script, you can use and/or modify the
script as
I was once using straight 3c-BSDL but one incident (I am not from an Anglophone
country) proved to me that it's language is too complex in local courts. Now I
am sort of forced into creating a functional equivalent using only simple
English (definition: restrict word usage to the 3000 basic
Sometimes licenses conflict, producing a non-distributable mess of licenses for
a piece of code. Using my such code internally is not that much of a problem
but what if I used such piece of code in a web application?
My project involves transcoding video files on the cloud, hard dubbing the
Just wondering, since decades if not centuries ago a prior art already stood
there, why would the patent still be relevant in the first place? If the
hostile IP cockroach is biting you can show the court those prior art, either
proving that their patents have nothing to do with your code, or
Then I would like to propose this Copyleft-modified 2BSDL (or its 3BSDL-based
cousin) but how? I would prefer writing the additional clause in the same
fashion of the original clauses though.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 30, 2015, at 22:24, co...@ccil.org wrote:
Maxthon Chan scripsit:
Is
9 matches
Mail list logo
