On 02/01/2012 05:25 PM, Karl Fogel wrote:
An hypothesis:
If a license is already approved as open source, and the copyright
holder adds an exception that merely indicates that under certain
circumstances they will not enforce certain terms of the license, then
the distribution terms are still
On 08/14/2012 11:43 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
I don't see how copyright can be enforced when it is both explicitly
disclaimed and the link with the author is severed. There would be no
way to enforce it, nobody to go after for implicit warranties, etc.
After all it would be like asking
On 01/08/2013 10:43 PM, Engel Nyst wrote:
On 1/7/13, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Karl Fogel kfo...@red-bean.com wrote:
What I meant was a specific rewording. In other words, I'm inviting you
to do the work you're inviting me to do :-).
I'll do it, it's a
On 01/05/2013 09:42 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
I've personally never seen open source forum software that wasn't an
abysmal nightmare from a usability perspective, whereas many people
here have email clients that they have chosen and customized
specifically to deal with their workflow. So I'm very
On 06/26/2013 03:48 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
For a given copyrighted property or set of properties, a court is going
to be looking to determine the licensors' actions (what they have
permitted and subject to what conditions), and be primarily guided in
the case of a written licence by the licence
5 matches
Mail list logo
