Re: Adaptive Public License review

2004-04-22 Thread Carmen Leeming
John, thank you for taking the time to review the entire license. My responses to your comments/suggestions are embedded below: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... SHOW-STOPPER: Though the APL is MPL-ish in nature, it has a few provisions modeled after the GPL, but intensified in such a way that I

Re: Adaptive Public License review

2004-04-22 Thread jcowan
Carmen Leeming scripsit: A Distributor may choose to distribute the Licensed Work, or any portion thereof, in Executable form (an EXECUTABLE DISTRIBUTION) to any third party, under the terms of Section 2 of this License, provided the Executable Distribution is made available under and

Re: Adaptive Public License

2004-04-16 Thread Ernest Prabhakar
Hi Carmen, I sympathize with your goal. I think there's really several things going on: a) You want to create a license for your project b) You want to make it easy for people to create variations of your license c) You'd like to get OSI approval once to cover all licenses In that sense,

Re: Adaptive Public License

2004-04-16 Thread Rod Dixon
This is a good point. I also laud the effort by those who spent the past year or so trying to make it easier to use and adapt licenses. Unfortunately, occasionally something meant to be easy is more complex because it bends too many preexisting rules or customs. The easy way to make a modular

Re: Adaptive Public License

2004-04-15 Thread Rod Dixon
Michael - I agree with you regarding whether this license solves a problem that an existing license does not. I think the drafter will have to explain; otherwise, I would not recommend approval of the Adaptive Public License since it is not attached to a specific project and appears to be an

Re: Adaptive Public License

2004-04-15 Thread Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
It sounds as if you are attempting both to control the distribution of your license along with your software package and to control the distribution of the license as adapted for others; this is rather strange to me. I think there are, generally, three approaches to drafting open source licenses:

Re: Adaptive Public License

2004-04-15 Thread Carmen Leeming
I am sorry for the confusion in my previous email regarding our application of the Adaptive Public License. We have developed a specific program that we wish to distribute as open source. Our requirements were not met by any existing license. We therefore hired a lawyer to aid in drafting a