On Friday 26 May 2006 15:08, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Friday 26 May 2006 14:29, Jon Keating wrote:
> > On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:33:53AM +0200, Ladislav Michnovi? wrote:
> > > You mean it works fine with the patch or witout the patch?
> >
> > Without the patch, it should work fine. I can verify i
On Friday 26 May 2006 14:29, Jon Keating wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:33:53AM +0200, Ladislav Michnovi? wrote:
> > You mean it works fine with the patch or witout the patch?
>
> Without the patch, it should work fine. I can verify it on my system.
> How about yours?
I will try again with th
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:33:53AM +0200, Ladislav Michnovi? wrote:
> You mean it works fine with the patch or witout the patch?
Without the patch, it should work fine. I can verify it on my system.
How about yours?
Jon
--
Jon Keating
2006/5/26, Jon Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:17:49PM +0200, Ladislav Michnovi? wrote:
> Hello.
> I want to just make sure what was the reason, why this patch was not
> checked in svn?
The main reason is that it doesn't change functionality, it changes how
things are don
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:17:49PM +0200, Ladislav Michnovi? wrote:
> Hello.
> I want to just make sure what was the reason, why this patch was not
> checked in svn?
The main reason is that it doesn't change functionality, it changes how
things are done. The current SVN should be working fine with
Hello.
I want to just make sure what was the reason, why this patch was not
checked in svn?
Regards Ladislav.
2005/11/21, Kevin Krammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
sorry for not finding this earlier, I have been testing with the anonymous CVS
and didn't see that the userinfodlg.cpp file was differe
Hi,
sorry for not finding this earlier, I have been testing with the anonymous CVS
and didn't see that the userinfodlg.cpp file was different in the release tar
ball.
The tr("KDE Addressbook") gets an automatically assigned shortcut somehow, so
tabList[KABCInfo].label is no more equal to the s
