Jacob Bunk Nielsen wrote:
> "" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Port 1024 is not a privileged port as far as I know.
>
Uhuh, could be, okay, you are right, i thought 1024 was not priviledged, it is.
Arjen
___
Licq-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PR
"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + // The following is a FILTHY hack around the fact that we are not allowed to
> + // open a port below 1024. We get a segfault if we try so...
> +
> + if (_nPort <= 1024)
Strictly speaking it should be
if (_nPort < 1024)
or
if (_nPort <= 1
I wrote a patch around it, it works, BUT someone NEEDS BADLY to look at a better
solution, this just checks if the port we are trying to open as a TCP server, is
not below 1024. If so, just tell that we cant open that port ;)
File atached, just have a l00k at it :)
Arjen
Mikael Vidstedt wrot
If TCPPortsLow and TCPPortsHigh in licq.conf are set to privileged ports
(eg. 110 and 120 respectively) and running as a non-privileged user,
there will be a segmentation fault at startup. This is because
CICQDaemon::StartTCPServer tries to bind to one port at a time, failing
each time (Permissio
