Re: [Licq-devel] the problem has to be the patch

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 13:07:10 -0700 (PDT) Dima K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok I think I know what the problem is. > > My patch contains: > > licq_qt_gui_la_LDFLAGS = $(X_LIBS) $(QT_LDFLAGS) \ > - -module -avoid-version -rpath $(libdir) -R$(QT_LIBDIR) > + -module -avoid-version -rpath $(libdir

Re: [Licq-devel] the problem has to be the patch

On Tuesday 29 July 2003 15:24, Pollywog wrote: > The problem has to be with Dima's patch. I just compiled Licq 1.2.7 > without the patch and it works fine, but if I patch a fresh tarball and > compile from it, I get those same errors. > i just checked out licq-1_2_7 from CVS, applied the patch an

Re: [Licq-devel] the problem has to be the patch

Ok I think I know what the problem is. My patch contains: licq_qt_gui_la_LDFLAGS = $(X_LIBS) $(QT_LDFLAGS) \ - -module -avoid-version -rpath $(libdir) -R$(QT_LIBDIR) + -module -avoid-version -rpath $(libdir) licq_qt_gui_la_LIBADD = $(LIB_QT) $(X_PRE_LIBS) -lX11 -lXext \ $(XSS_LIBS) $(X_EXTRA_

[Licq-devel] the problem has to be the patch

The problem has to be with Dima's patch. I just compiled Licq 1.2.7 without the patch and it works fine, but if I patch a fresh tarball and compile from it, I get those same errors. On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 16:27:58 + Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:08:36 -0700 (PD