[Licq-devel] OpenSSL & MSN Plugin

2005-01-19 Thread jonas
Again I can't ./configure the MSN-Plugin: checking for MD5 in -lssl... no configure: error: *** OpenSSL is required by MSN. Please visit http://www.openssl.org and *** install the latest version what can I do to tell the Script where the libs / includes are? I already tried --with-openssl-lib=..

Re: [Licq-devel] Some msgs from Mac OS X client are lost

2005-01-19 Thread Daniel Glöckner
The problem is CICQDaemon::ProcessMessageFam calling CTranslator::FromUnicode to convert those messages. CTranslator::FromUnicode expects zero terminated UTF-8 strings and furthermore replaces every character beyond 0xff with a '?'. Daniel pgpOHFQkqdlAD.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Licq-devel] OpenSSL & MSN Plugin

2005-01-19 Thread Jon Keating
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:09:13 +0100, jonas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Again I can't ./configure the MSN-Plugin: > > checking for MD5 in -lssl... no > configure: error: > *** OpenSSL is required by MSN. Please visit http://www.openssl.org and > *** install the latest version > > what can I do to

Re: [Licq-devel] can't find libgpgme

2005-01-19 Thread Jon Keating
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:58:37 +, Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can compile Licq with the 1.0.x releases, but gpg-agent never asks for my > password and even if the password is in my licq configs, I can't read > encrypted messages. The error messages in stderr suggest the problem is no

Re: [Licq-devel] can't find libgpgme

2005-01-19 Thread Jon Keating
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:18:04 +0900, Jon Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem is with a compiler flag that is used with GPGME and must > be used with Licq when it is compiled. I'm working on a fix now. Should be fixed in developer's CVS now. Wait for anon CVS to get updated or apply the

Re: [Licq-devel] rejecting unsigned/unencrypted messages

2005-01-19 Thread Jon Keating
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:24:49 +, Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know how many of you receive spam ICQ messages, I have not received > very many of them recently and that might be because I have Licq set to > reject new users. Yes, that would do it. > Would it be practical to have