Great!
Thanx
Heiko
On 11.03.2009, at 02:01, TylerWeir wrote:
Derek, Marius and I are writing a book for Lift:
http://github.com/tjweir/liftbook/tree/master
and
http://cloud.github.com/downloads/tjweir/liftbook/master-20090309.pdf
On Mar 10, 3:07 pm, Heiko Seeberger
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Alex Boisvert boisv...@intalio.com wrote:
Between Scala and Lift, ScalaCheck and Specs, Eclipse and Buildr, Jetty and
JavaRebel, it's amazing to see how far the tools have evolved in the 2 years
I've been following Scala.
I had my epiphany today while
I recommed http://www.slicehost.com/I have not done any serious Lift work
there, but I have checked that Lift works well on the 256 slice. It's quite
cheap and the first service I found to work out of the box without any
problems for such money. I did install
ubuntu, then apt-get ant, maven, java,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:30 PM, DavidV david.v.villa...@gmail.com wrote:
In the webapp I'm working on, I have three separate forms (snippets)
linked to three separate objects. I would like to maintain a link
between the objects through ID fields, since all three forms contain
information
Hi Alex,
Knowing that you can write specs which can be run as JUnit tests,
can't the continuous testing plugin in Eclipse work with that?
Or would you like something simple like autotest in Ruby which polls
the modified files regularly and executes the tests in the console if
any file is
About naming convention of test, I used :
class XxxxSpecTest extends org.specs.runner.JUnit4(XxxxSpec)
import org.specs._
object XxxxSpec extends Specification with ScalaCheck {
About file roller, I could modify the maven:cc to add an option that
rerun every test on change but I thing it
Add
arg-nowarn/arg
The the plugin config section. The whole plugin would look like:
plugin
groupIdorg.scala-tools/groupId
artifactIdmaven-scala-plugin/artifactId
executions
execution
goals
goalcompile/goal
Fixed in the 1.1 branch. It might make sense to back-port to the 1.0 branch
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:49 PM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll look on it this evening ...
On Mar 11, 1:12 pm, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Just realised i had not posted the
The git diff makes it hard to see what happened (it looks like Req was
replaced wholesale). What did it end up being?
Thanks,
Derek
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:15 AM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Fixed in the 1.1 branch. It might make sense to back-port to the 1.0
branch
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:55 AM, etorreborre etorrebo...@gmail.com wrote:
Knowing that you can write specs which can be run as JUnit tests,
can't the continuous testing plugin in Eclipse work with that?
I'm using Eclipse 3.4 and neither ct-eclipse nor the MIT continuous testing
tools seem to
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Raoul Duke rao...@gmail.com wrote:
Between Scala and Lift, ScalaCheck and Specs, Eclipse and Buildr, Jetty
and
JavaRebel, it's amazing to see how far the tools have evolved in the 2
years
I've been following Scala.
so... any good concise instructions on
Late to the party here, but I would second the request for Alex's
writeup of his dev environment formula. A link reference would be
most appreciated.
Thanks very much.
Dan
On Mar 11, 9:38 am, Alex Boisvert boisv...@intalio.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Raoul Duke
Ohh goody goody goody ... I won't have to fix it :D ... so back on the
book work ...
On Mar 11, 5:15 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Fixed in the 1.1 branch. It might make sense to back-port to the 1.0 branch
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:49 PM, marius d.
Hi,
I have a unit test which call a method which uses the locale method S.?
(String). It throws a nullpointer, though.
Did I forget to setup things somewhere? Or can't I use S.? without a running
request?
The call to S.? works fine in a running web application.
Thanks a lot,
Joachim
The
Can you try
S.initIfUninitted(liftSession) {
do your code here
}
?
... but you'd still need to create a dumb LiftSession
Br's,
Marius
On Mar 11, 8:40 pm, Joachim A. wallaby.po...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a unit test which call a method which uses the locale method S.?
Hello,
I could not help but notice that the mini site map that gets returned
on google when searching for lift framework has dead links. Can
someone fix that?
Larry
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.comwrote:
The git diff makes it hard to see what happened (it looks like Req was
replaced wholesale). What did it end up being?
We were not always doing null testing for request.request. I fixed that.
There are cases where
In short, no. We can't fix those results as they are generated by
google not by our good selves.
I belive this is because the wiki used to be on the lift TLD. Over
time this will work itself out - appologies for any confussion this
had caused.
Cheers, Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On 11 Mar
For group benifit, the fix to Req solves the comet issue. Awesome.
Cheers
Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On 11 Mar 2009, at 22:51, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Derek Chen-Becker dchenbec...@gmail.com
wrote:
The git diff makes it hard to
Hi,
I don't know how this could help because I've been away from lift code
for a long time. But I remember that I tried to use mocks with JMock
and specs in order to specify the example site (\liftweb\sites
\example\src\test\scala\net\liftweb\example\snippet).
The idea was to simulate a
20 matches
Mail list logo
