[Lift] Re: Anyone out there using SBT?

2009-07-06 Thread Mark Harrah
> Maven is totally the right tool for lift project management, and im not > suggesting moving that or anything, but im considering having a lift > archetype that uses SBT so people have the choice when developing their > applications. You might have already seen this, but Nathan and I did some wo

[Lift] Re: Liftweb without Maven?

2009-04-17 Thread Mark Harrah
: > excellent, thanks for finishing this off mark! is it possible this > might get into a later sbt release or does this belong somewhere in > the lift source tree? > > thank you! > Alex > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Mark Harrah wrote: > > Hi, > > >

[Lift] Re: Liftweb without Maven?

2009-04-16 Thread Mark Harrah
Hi, Thanks for putting effort into this. The inline dependency declarations replace the pom.xml, so it isn't needed. You can also declare the archetype as a dependency and extract and process it. I have attached a project definition that does not require downloading the zip manually or processi

[Lift] Re: Fwd: [scala] ANNOUNCE: sbt 0.3.2

2008-12-19 Thread Mark Harrah
Hi David, I have used sbt to compile and test lift at some point (I haven't updated for the recent reorganization). However, let me point out that sbt cannot do the following yet: 1) build with a different version of scala/java than the one sbt was called with 2) package a war file 3) start jett