[Lift] Re: Mapper to Record ORM

2009-03-20 Thread Mateusz Fiołka
As far as I remember David said once, that Mapper will be anyway a part of Lift and it will be not deprecated. Regards, Mateusz On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Alex a...@liivid.com wrote: I have been looking through Lift documents trying to figure out what to do about an ORM for my first

[Lift] Re: Lift-friendly Web Hosting

2009-03-11 Thread Mateusz Fiołka
I recommed http://www.slicehost.com/I have not done any serious Lift work there, but I have checked that Lift works well on the 256 slice. It's quite cheap and the first service I found to work out of the box without any problems for such money. I did install ubuntu, then apt-get ant, maven, java,

[Lift] Re: Can or Box or something else

2008-12-21 Thread Mateusz Fiołka
Result +1 Quite short, only one selfexplaining imo and describes the purpose it serves well. The only downsides of this name is +3 characters and the fact that the class could be used also as non result but for other purpose. On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Derek Chen-Becker

[Lift] Re: The first Lift tutorial: a ToDo application

2008-12-06 Thread Mateusz Fiołka
The IdPK paragraph explains trait behaviour in Scala but doesn't say what does this trait mean. One can suspect it flags the class to have primary key but it is not obvious. lift:Util.out I think the name is too generic. I know it is a tutorial but it may be seen as kind of small code smell. How

[Lift] Re: lift:surround and multiple templates

2008-09-26 Thread Mateusz Fiołka
I also lost half a day with this error. Is this rule at least documented anywhere? Regards, Mateusz On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Charles F. Munat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, ha! I knew it had to be something simple like that. Good to know that hidden-templates can't reuse the names of