Hi,
I noticed logged in user still can't see messages by other users they
follow. There were couple of messages still missing parameters. Patch
shows the parts that need to be modified to get it working again.
- Vesa
diff --git a/lift-examples/skittr/src/main/scala/com/skittr/actor
I would also appreciate aggregated docs. It would be great to have
these at least for the M-releases..
- Vesa
On 7 marras, 05:47, aw anth...@whitford.com wrote:
OK, so I can go tohttp://scala-tools.org/mvnsites/liftweb-1.1-7/
but I am not finding a comprehensive ScalaDoc similar to what
Hi,
It would be nice to have some kind of tutorial on how to use this new
addition.
- Vesa
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
Hi,
Thanks for this addition, I just bumped into a similar problem and
found solution immediately from here!
- Vesa
On 5 marras, 01:18, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
What about:
LiftRules.liftRequest.append {
case Req(other_stuff :: _, _, _) = false
}
If you've
Why not with varargs like on below?
case class Link(pathParts: String*)
and I can say Link(a, b)?
- Vesa
On 3 marras, 00:15, Jim Barrows jim.barr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Vesa brut...@gmail.com wrote:
You're right about that. You probably wouldn't get very far
test_it_says_hello_to_a_person
get '/', :name = 'Simon'
assert last_response.body.include?('Simon')
end
end
-Vesa
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb
Hi,
I'm aware of Selenium, but it operates on higher level than Rack::Test
and is slower although testing mimics real world situations better as
it drives a real browser. Can I find some examples of testkit
somewhere?
- Vesa
On 2 marras, 17:04, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote
the default meta functionality?
- Vesa
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb
I doubt I can find one, but it still feels awkward having to type the
name of the class so many times. Another option could be to use some
shared object to do this stuff, but I guess it wouldn't be as neat to
use it then.
- Vesa
On 2 marras, 18:33, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
). I
guess varargs might be out of question if scala backward compatibility
is considered, but I don't see a reason not to use case classes here.
- Vesa
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group
By the way, why orm classes need to be aware of the companion object?
Could this dependency be eliminated somehow?
- Vesa
On 2 marras, 22:02, Vesa brut...@gmail.com wrote:
I doubt I can find one, but it still feels awkward having to type the
name of the class so many times. Another option
make pages as menu items or make some kind of
distinction between access control and menus. Is it so common case
that this is the best thing to do and I just don't realize yet how
much easier my life is with SiteMap?
- Vesa
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
S keeps popping up a lot :D
ps. Great framework!
- Vesa
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
You're right about that. You probably wouldn't get very far without
understanding that. I'm still concerned that I have to type
unnecessary stuff to express myself without getting any gains in (new
Link(a :: b :: nil) vs Link(a, b)) :D
- Vesa
On 2 marras, 22:27, Jim Barrows jim.barr
Also some plain true or false doesn't really explain it's purpose very
well and with AbsoluteLink(a, b) I wouldn't have to guess the
meaning or look it up from API documentation.
- Vesa
On 2 marras, 22:34, Vesa brut...@gmail.com wrote:
You're right about that. You probably wouldn't get very
Seems very reasonable, thanks for the unbelievable fast responses!
- Vesa
On 2 marras, 22:32, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Vesa brut...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a feeling that SiteMap is a common cause of frustration among
16 matches
Mail list logo
