Just an fyi for the group...
http://www.andyczerwonka.com/platform
Another convert added to the list...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to lift...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
:
The interest and excitement about Scala continues to grow. It's great to see
Lift reaching the 1.0 milestone as this is a proof point for the maturity of
Scala as a software platform.
Cheers, Tim
On 18 Feb 2010, at 13:25, czerwonka wrote:
Just an fyi for the group...
http
read it as the other way around
Cheers, Tim
On 18 Feb 2010, at 15:02, czerwonka wrote:
I got the quotes from the Lift site.
http://liftweb.net/quotes.html
Shall I change them?
On Feb 18, 7:41 am, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Someone ought to tell them
will be maintained for quite a while after Record comes out, and the
two (at present) have similar architectures. JPA is certainly an option, but
don't toss Mapper out as an option simply because Record will be in place in
the near future.
Derek
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:41 AM, czerwonka
It'd be nice not to have to port. I'd hat to have to port my mapper
code as soon after I write it. Maybe JPA is the answer then.
On Jul 10, 7:24 am, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Mapper as Record is not yet complete.
Br's,
Marius
On Jul 10, 4:21 pm, czerwonka andy.czerwo
I apologize if this is not the right place, but I noticed that you
have the Google code formatter installed on the Lift site.
http://liftweb.net/index.php/Lift_View_First
http://code.google.com/p/syntaxhighlighter/wiki/Usage
Given that it's a MediaWiki site, how did you get the pages to include
