Oh I didn't think of that one because the type of the argument is Seq[A] though
I guess it's safe as long as possible is passed in as a List[A], since scala's
match will automatically downcast during a match.
-Ross
On Nov 22, 2009, at 10:43 PM, David Pollak wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Ross Mellgren wrote:
> Well, yes, in both senses of returning a ChoiceHolder containing more than
> one and in the sense of calling the callback with all set ones. This was
> (apparently) the intended behavior and was accidentally changed.
>
> We could make a new
Well, yes, in both senses of returning a ChoiceHolder containing more than one
and in the sense of calling the callback with all set ones. This was
(apparently) the intended behavior and was accidentally changed.
We could make a new one for a single checkbox, but then the question of what to
do
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Ross Mellgren wrote:
> yejun on github opened up an issue:
>
> def checkbox[T](possible : Seq[T], actual : Seq[T], func : (Seq[T]) => Any,
> attrs : (String, String)*)
>
>
Checkbox is returning a list of checkboxes? Could we at least make checkbox
return and eit
On review board: http://reviewboard.liftweb.net/r/117/
I added a few doc comments to nearby stuff, let me know if there are
inaccuracies or style changes that should be made.
-Ross
On Nov 21, 2009, at 9:37 PM, David Pollak wrote:
> Looks like I was over-eager with the HPP stuff.
>
> Yeah, che
Looks like I was over-eager with the HPP stuff.
Yeah, checkbox should return the entire list of things checked.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Ross Mellgren wrote:
> yejun on github opened up an issue:
>
> def checkbox[T](possible : Seq[T], actual : Seq[T], func : (Seq[T]) => Any,
> attrs :
yejun on github opened up an issue:
> def checkbox[T](possible : Seq[T], actual : Seq[T], func : (Seq[T])
> => Any, attrs : (String, String)*)
> Func will only return first element in possible when it is checked
> or List().
It is easily reproducible.
Based on the type of func, I agree it lo
