2009/4/16 David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com:
Taking the discussion to the main list
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Jonas Bonér jo...@jonasboner.com wrote:
2009/4/16 David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Jonas Bonér jo...@jonasboner.com
I'm currently giving AOP a try
herehttp://github.com/mighdoll/aspecting/tree/master(not in lift).
I was looking for a cleaner way to create objects with
observable properties. I like that an aspect allows for observable objects
that are idiomatic to use and write, and don't require any extra
Lee,
The reason that Lift has the richer MappedField and Field objects in Mapper
and Record is to programmatically add this kind of functionality to fields.
No, it's not PoJos, but it's as syntactically clean and a lot easier to
understand/debug.
Thanks,
David
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:47 AM,
I am firmly against anything that re-writes byte-code after the
compilation
phase for production code. Once the Scala-Maven plugin supports
compiler
plugins, then there's a lot of stuff that can be done at compile-time.
The scala-maven plugin already supports compiler plugins. Feel
