On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Oliver ola...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for all the help, it appears to all be working now - I had a
feeling I was going to be fed to the lions, wolves, tigers and bears
if I didn't find a fix, and quick.
One question, does the name generation have to be based
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Oliver ola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've got a error on one of our Apache/Tomcat servers with binding, it
works in Jetty and another Apache/Tomcat server.
It looks like lift is calling some of the function setters after
calling a method on a
Okay,
The problem is that your computer is too fast. :-)
Lift assigns function names based on the nano time. It turns out that the
methods are getting called so fast, there's no nano tick and the order of
the function creation is not reflected in the function name.
I've got a fix. I'll roll it
David
Thanks for the prompt reply.
I'll upgrade to the latest version of lift so I can use the fix when
it comes in. Is everything relatively stable at the current snapshot?
cheers
Oliver
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay,
The problem
Thanks for all the help, it appears to all be working now - I had a
feeling I was going to be fed to the lions, wolves, tigers and bears
if I didn't find a fix, and quick.
One question, does the name generation have to be based on a random
number generator? I realize, with the length of the
