David,
Do you have a schema to govern lift tags so that this sort of syntactic
constraint could be statically checked?
Best wishes,
--greg
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:11 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tim Perrett
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Meredith Gregory
lgreg.mered...@gmail.comwrote:
David,
Do you have a schema to govern lift tags so that this sort of syntactic
constraint could be statically checked?
No.
Perhaps it's something we should add to our documentation to-do list.
Best
The lift:with-param/ tag has to be a child of the lift:surround/ tag.
I'm in the process of checking in a change to relax this constraint, but it
will have a negative impact on the ability to do nested lift:surround/ tags.
It being a child of lift:surround is not directly the problem.
David,
If you can give me some quick and dirty informal description of the
constraints, i can code up a schema in short order.
Best wishes,
--greg
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:20 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Meredith Gregory
Greg,
I'm going to spend some time late next week cleaning up the render
pipeline. I'll prepare the notes during my cleaning session.
It would also be nice to have tests for the expected behaviors. Any
volunteers out there?
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Meredith Gregory
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:11 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Tim Perrett he...@timperrett.comwrote:
It appears that to make with-param work you need to have a root node
inside the with-param node and that the single closed element
