[Lift] Re: Direct access to response.outputStream?

2010-02-26 Thread Marius
On Feb 26, 11:50 am, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote: Hi, I need to create a response that downloads a file. The file is generated by a 3rd party api that takes an output stream as the target for the file. As the file can be rather large, I would like to stream this file

Re: [Lift] Re: Direct access to response.outputStream?

2010-02-26 Thread Jeppe Nejsum Madsen
Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com writes: On Feb 26, 11:50 am, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote: Hi, I need to create a response that downloads a file. The file is generated by a 3rd party api that takes an output stream as the target for the file. As the file can be rather large, I

Re: [Lift] Re: Direct access to response.outputStream?

2010-02-26 Thread Jeppe Nejsum Madsen
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote: So the thread creation/scheduling and the two times file copying could be avoided by writing directly to the output stream. But I agree this would have to be special cased somehow. It's not an urgent issue atm, but

[Lift] Re: Direct access to response.outputStream?

2010-02-26 Thread Marius
On Feb 26, 1:29 pm, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote: So the thread creation/scheduling and the two times file copying could be avoided by writing directly to the output stream. But I agree this would

Re: [Lift] Re: Direct access to response.outputStream?

2010-02-26 Thread Jeppe Nejsum Madsen
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 26, 1:29 pm, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote: So the thread creation/scheduling and the two times file copying could be