On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm asking this because SHtml.a is a bit a-typical in the sense of
producing lift:a that will render the ajax link eventually.
This is a legacy of very old Lift and very old CometActors.
I'm cool with deprecating
sweet ! .. I'll take care of that.
On May 5, 7:18 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm asking this because SHtml.a is a bit a-typical in the sense of
producing lift:a that will render the ajax
Marius,
To clarify, your saying that you'd like to get rid of lift:a and move
the functionality into SHtml or something?
Thanks, Tim
On May 3, 11:51 am, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm asking this because SHtml.a is a bit a-typical in the sense of
producing lift:a that will
Well SHtml.a yields a lift:a and processed in its own snippet now. I
guess I'm only challenging the need for lift:a ... and try to
understand in what context people really use it.
Br's,
Marius
On May 3, 11:12 pm, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Marius,
To clarify, your saying
So your trying to asscertain if people use lift:a directly in there
template code?
On May 3, 9:35 pm, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Well SHtml.a yields a lift:a and processed in its own snippet now. I
guess I'm only challenging the need for lift:a ... and try to
understand in what
