+1
object in the http package sounds good to me for logical ordering.
Cheers, Tim
On Jan 11, 8:37 am, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 11, 10:27 am, Jeppe Nejsum Madsen je...@ingolfs.dk wrote:
Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com writes:
A while ago I started working on
Hmm, now this begs the question--does a ConversionRules object indeed belong in
http?
-
Timothy Perretttimo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
+1
object in the http package sounds good to me for logical ordering.
Cheers, Tim
On Jan 11, 8:37 am, Marius
I think so because it's about user's defined rules ... it's just an
extension of LiftRules, amd LiftRules lives in http package.
Br's,
Marius
On Jan 11, 6:45 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, now this begs the question--does a ConversionRules object indeed belong
in http?
