Very nice!
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, David Pollak
wrote:
> Okay, there's a simple answer that satisfies everyone:
>
> case class ParamCalcInfo(paramNames: List[String],
> params: Map[String, List[String]],
> uploadedFiles: List[FileParamHolder],
> body:
Okay, there's a simple answer that satisfies everyone:
case class ParamCalcInfo(paramNames: List[String],
params: Map[String, List[String]],
uploadedFiles: List[FileParamHolder],
body: Box[Array[Byte]])
lazy val ParamCalcInfo(paramNames: List[String],
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:13 PM, David Pollak
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Alex Boisvert
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:26 PM, David Pollak
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Speaking of warnings, which do you prefer (see patch below):
1) Explicit types on val extractors (as
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:26 PM, David Pollak <
> feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Speaking of warnings, which do you prefer (see patch below):
>>
>>>
>>> 1) Explicit types on val extractors (as it is today)
>>> 2) One-liner with no
On 17/11/09 5:26 AM, Kris Nuttycombe wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Kris Nuttycombe
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:28 PM, David Pollak
>> wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a lot of:
>>> [INFO] Unable to find resource 'javax.script:script-js:pom:1.0' in
>>> repository sp
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Kris Nuttycombe
wrote:
> Oops... I didn't realize I'd committed the pom with that in! I've no
> problem putting the extra warnings into a profile. Does Scala have an
> equivalent of or support the @SuppressWarnings annotation that you
> have in Java?
>
I'm not awa
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:26 PM, David Pollak wrote:
> Speaking of warnings, which do you prefer (see patch below):
>
>>
>> 1) Explicit types on val extractors (as it is today)
>> 2) One-liner with no types (proposed)
>>
>> We could save 4 warnings...
>>
>
> Here's the cost of the 4 warnings:
>
>
If something is a choice of a pattern match type annotation warning, or a plain
asInstanceOf, my personal preference would be the match.
-
David Pollak wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Kris Nuttyc
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Kris Nuttycombe <
> kris.nuttyco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:28 PM, David Pollak
>> wrote:
>> > Folks,
>> >
>> > I'm seeing a lot of:
>> > [INFO] Unable to find resource 'javax.scri
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Kris Nuttycombe
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:28 PM, David Pollak
> wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I'm seeing a lot of:
> > [INFO] Unable to find resource 'javax.script:script-js:pom:1.0' in
> > repository specs-repository (http://specs.googlecode.com/svn/maven2
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Kris Nuttycombe
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:28 PM, David Pollak
> wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'm seeing a lot of:
>> [INFO] Unable to find resource 'javax.script:script-js:pom:1.0' in
>> repository specs-repository (http://specs.googlecode.com/svn/maven2/)
>>
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 4:28 PM, David Pollak
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm seeing a lot of:
> [INFO] Unable to find resource 'javax.script:script-js:pom:1.0' in
> repository specs-repository (http://specs.googlecode.com/svn/maven2/)
>
> Also, I know Kris turned on type erasure warnings because he want
12 matches
Mail list logo