I understand your thoughts David ... but I'm not convinced that Java
serialization is the way to go. A more efficient serialization of the
dependency graph sounds more appropriate but also quite complex.
Br's,
Marius
On Aug 25, 12:42 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
On Aug 24, 12:06 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:45 AM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm .. I'm wondering if we can write a Scala compiler plugin that
transform functions provided to Lift's S/SHtml function etc. into a
richer
Please ignore the fact that my keyboard seems to be full of shite...
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:13 AM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.comwrote:
On Aug 24, 12:06 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:13 AM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 24, 12:06 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:45 AM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hmmm .. I'm wondering if we can write a Scala compiler plugin
On Aug 24, 10:39 am, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:13 AM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 24, 12:06 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:45 AM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just a FYI. I briefly talked with Martin and he said this idea is
possible but quite tricky. Stephane Micheloud did something similar
and he may share some of his work. I'm waiting some feedback from him.
Br's,
Marius
On Aug 24, 10:46 am, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 24,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:36 PM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a FYI. I briefly talked with Martin and he said this idea is
possible but quite tricky. Stephane Micheloud did something similar
and he may share some of his work. I'm waiting some feedback from him.
I think we
David,
Can one leave proxies in place for things that are not actually
serializable?
Best wishes,
--greg
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:55 PM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:36 PM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.comwrote:
Just a FYI. I briefly
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Meredith Gregory lgreg.mered...@gmail.com
wrote:
David,
Can one leave proxies in place for things that are not actually
serializable?
Anything that's marked serializable should be... and it's up to the thing
that marks itself as serialiable to create a
Changed the thread subject ...
Marius
On Aug 22, 6:17 pm, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Great thing Dave.
Roughly having a bound function f that user provided say in an
ajaxButton call.The function f may hold references to other functions,
session/request-vars, references to
I'm wondering if we can't leverage JavaSpaces to handle a lot of this stuff.
From my experience with the technology it seems to be a pretty good fit for
the problem.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:06 AM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Changed the thread subject ...
Marius
On Aug
I've been playing with JINI a few years ago a liked it a lot (not a
simple programming model, but JavaSpace reduces a lot of such
complexity) but I'm not sure how fitful it really is in stax like
environments where broadcast UDP may not be supported so discovery
service would be more difficult.
I guess JGroups is another alternative here, it's a bit lower level, but
does let you set up nodes manually - so it's not an issue that you need UDP
broadcast (although it helps...)
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 1:09 PM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been playing with JINI a few
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Kevin Wright kev.lee.wri...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I'm wondering if we can't leverage JavaSpaces to handle a lot of this
stuff. From my experience with the technology it seems to be a pretty good
fit for the problem.
Two reasons:
- JavaSpaces is as far as I
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 7:04 PM, David
Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Kevin Wright
kev.lee.wri...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm wondering if we can't leverage JavaSpaces to handle a lot of this
stuff. From my experience with the technology it seems
Hmmm .. I'm wondering if we can write a Scala compiler plugin that
transform functions provided to Lift's S/SHtml function etc. into a
richer FunctionX implementation that knows how to serialize it's
members. We could restrict the types that as LiftSerializable on top
of primitives, Calenars,
Also FlyObjectSpace (http://www.flyobjectspace.com/)
It comes with a suitable licence and has a Scala version. Not used it
myself but I'm definitely about to check it out...
I'd also be willing to be that the devs would be extremely accommodating if
it were being used in a high profile project
On Aug 23, 9:47 pm, Ryan Donahue donahu...@gmail.com wrote:
Marius, this sound like a very good idea. This would allow the app
developer to decide whether to spend the extra time thinking about
serialization/session replication. If you don't need it, then you
don't use the compiler plugin
Marius, this sound like a very good idea. This would allow the app
developer to decide whether to spend the extra time thinking about
serialization/session replication. If you don't need it, then you
don't use the compiler plugin and just continue building lift apps as
you have been. If you do
Sure thing Greg.
On Aug 23, 9:59 pm, Meredith Gregory lgreg.mered...@gmail.com wrote:
Marius,
This is closely related to the proposal to deal with http streams via
delimited continuations. Sorry i haven't fleshed this out a bit. Let me put
my thoughts on paper/pseudo code and email it out
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:45 AM, marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm .. I'm wondering if we can write a Scala compiler plugin that
transform functions provided to Lift's S/SHtml function etc. into a
richer FunctionX implementation that knows how to serialize it's
members. We could
21 matches
Mail list logo
