[Lift] Re: Supporting Jetty 7 Continuations

2009-10-07 Thread David Pollak
I was hoping to generically support Servlet 3.0 continuations (which should work for Jetty 7 and Glassfish). Please open a ticket for it. On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: Guys, I just wanted to rename this thread and raise this for proper

[Lift] Re: Supporting Jetty 7 Continuations

2009-10-07 Thread Timothy Perrett
I know that has been the plan - but I cant help but think that Servlet 3.0 is still a long way off standardisation? What do you think? Cheers, Tim On 7 Oct 2009, at 16:53, David Pollak wrote: I was hoping to generically support Servlet 3.0 continuations (which should work for Jetty 7

[Lift] Re: Supporting Jetty 7 Continuations

2009-10-07 Thread David Pollak
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote: I know that has been the plan - but I cant help but think that Servlet 3.0 is still a long way off standardisation? It's been 3 months away from being a standard for almost 2 years. ;-) What do you think?

[Lift] Re: Supporting Jetty 7 Continuations

2009-10-07 Thread Timothy Perrett
My point exactly! To that end, why dont we just add a small matching statement or switch that allows using Jetty 7 - only the package structure has changed not the continuation API itself so it should be fairly trivial. The jetty- runner stuff would really get me out of jetty-wrapper-hell

[Lift] Re: Supporting Jetty 7 Continuations

2009-10-07 Thread Randinn
Looks like you need to open a ticket for that :P On Oct 8, 3:50 am, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote: My point exactly! To that end, why dont we just add a small matching statement or switch   that allows using Jetty 7 - only the package structure has changed not   the