Just pushed this change - archetypes now work seamlessly.
Cheers, Tim
On Apr 21, 9:30 pm, David Pollak
wrote:
> Please make it so.
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this gro
Please make it so.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
>
> Hey Heiko,
>
> This was my feeling - im aware that class does not exist in version
> 7... I guess my point was do we need to change the lift-archetype so
> that it explicitly defines jetty 6? It seems that this would s
+1 for changing.
Am 19.04.2009 um 22:59 schrieb Timothy Perrett
:
>
> Hey Heiko,
>
> This was my feeling - im aware that class does not exist in version
> 7... I guess my point was do we need to change the lift-archetype so
> that it explicitly defines jetty 6? It seems that this would smooth
Hey Heiko,
This was my feeling - im aware that class does not exist in version
7... I guess my point was do we need to change the lift-archetype so
that it explicitly defines jetty 6? It seems that this would smooth
the curve for newbies :-)
Cheers, Tim
On Apr 19, 9:50 pm, Heiko Seeberger
wrot
You need to change the Version range for Jetty in the POM: No version 7!
Am 19.04.2009 um 22:34 schrieb Tim Perrett :
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Just having a play around with the new eclipse plugins and the lift
> archetypes. With a fresh install of Eclipse and the latest RC version
> of eclipse scala p
