[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread Meredith Gregory
Tim, Essentially, i want every request for http://localhost:8080 to start up a new session. This should force login each time. Best wishes, --greg On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Tim Perrett he...@timperrett.com wrote: Can you clarify what you mean by instance? You mean run jetty on

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread David Pollak
Greg, If each HTTP request to localhost had a new session, what would happen when you log in? If you can tell me a little more about your use case, I'll work on a solution. Thanks, David On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Meredith Gregory lgreg.mered...@gmail.comwrote: Tim, Essentially, i

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread Meredith Gregory
David, This is merely demoware -- nothing deployable. i simply need the following behavior - get http://localhost:8080 provides a login page (always) - login sets up the session so that subsequent req's of the form http://localhost:8080/mumble-with-session-info provide access to that

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread Tim Perrett
This might be a stupid suggestion, but cant you just use two different browsers to be logged in with two users at the same time? Im guessing you want to demo some kind of comet behavior or similar between two users? Tim On Feb 12, 5:25 pm, Meredith Gregory lgreg.mered...@gmail.com wrote:

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread Meredith Gregory
Tim, That's a great idea. That's exactly what i want to do. Now, we're back to my initial report. Whoops! i must have used Firefox for both localhost requests before. If i use FF and Safari i get the behavior i wanted. Nevermind. ;-( Best wishes, --greg On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Tim

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread Charles F. Munat
Is this true for Google Chrome, too? (Probably, although each tab is a wholly separate process, I hear.) Chas. David Pollak wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Meredith Gregory lgreg.mered...@gmail.com mailto:lgreg.mered...@gmail.com wrote: David, This is merely

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread David Pollak
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote: Is this true for Google Chrome, too? (Probably, although each tab is a wholly separate process, I hear.) They share cookies between the processes unless you're browsing Incognito. Chas. David Pollak wrote:

[Lift] Re: lift jetty configuration question

2009-02-12 Thread Charles F. Munat
Good to know. David Pollak wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com mailto:c...@munat.com wrote: Is this true for Google Chrome, too? (Probably, although each tab is a wholly separate process, I hear.) They share cookies between the