On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Now you mention it though, it might well work quite nicely. Talk to me
Viktor - what are you thinking?
Just create an XSLT template to convert the lift templates to a a more
readable form?
Should be possible?
Just create an XSLT template to convert the lift templates to a a more
readable form?
Should be possible?
Your thinking just have an XSLT just for preview purposes? That would
be pretty sweet.
Perhaps we can do something with this:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Just create an XSLT template to convert the lift templates to a a more
readable form?
Should be possible?
Your thinking just have an XSLT just for preview purposes? That would
be pretty sweet.
Yes, my
Don't worry I'm just being slow as per normal viktor!
Do you want to try setting this up or shall I?
Cheers, Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Jun 2009, at 10:52, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu
wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Don't worry I'm just being slow as per normal viktor!
Do you want to try setting this up or shall I?
Make a draft and we'll help eachother out :)
Cheers, Tim
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Jun 2009, at 10:52,
Make a draft and we'll help eachother out :)
Ok will do - perhaps try mocking this up later in the week. Any
thoughts in and around this otherwise? Must haves vs nice to have?
Cheers, Tim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Make a draft and we'll help eachother out :)
Ok will do - perhaps try mocking this up later in the week. Any
thoughts in and around this otherwise? Must haves vs nice to have?
Hmmm, perhaps we should start with
Yoryos,
You probably missed the part where you can add a head element inside the
surround tags and it will replace the default element:
lift:surround with=default2 at=content
head
titleA better title than the one in default.html/title
/head
h2Welcome to your project!/h2
Agreed with Tim. I also don't see any value. And the point of viewing
the template statically is not an argument to me because the template
is still incomplete for a proper rendering, xhtml browser would
probably complain about prefixes it doesn't know about etc.
Br's,
Marius
On May 31, 5:32
Now you mention it though, it might well work quite nicely. Talk to me
Viktor - what are you thinking?
Cheers, Tim
On 31/05/2009 14:10, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
Couldn't they just define an XSLT template to view the lift templates with?
No! I didn't missed that part. Like Xavi said the benefit is a valid
html page. It would be much more intresting having something like
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xmlns:lift=http://
liftweb.net/
head!-- I don't not if it's valid to just not even have a head tag
when we don't want to
Folks,
There's nothing that Lift does magically with lift:surround/ or
lift:embed/ They just replace XML nodes.
If you want to structure your apps to not have surround or embed, that's
fine. If you want to surround or embed at different points in your files,
totally cool. Do it however you
There really is no benifit in this IMO - the only difference is that
you have more redundant code?
You can set the head from any page file like so:
lift:surround with=default at=content
head
titlemy lovely title/title
/head
h2Welcome to your project!/h2
plift:helloWorld.howdy //p
The value is that Yoryos version is a valid HTML page and can be
easily viewed without having lift/jetty running. This could be handy
for designs, for example.
I'm personally not 100% sold (I hate boilerplate), but it's an interesting idea.
-Xavi
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Timothy
14 matches
Mail list logo
