On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Meredith Gregory wrote:
> Lifted,
>
> Sorry for the sound and fury. i found the soln again: the following call
> had gotten mangled in boot
>
> LiftRules.addToPackages("com.biosimilarity.weather")
>
> That's a nasty one to get wrong. No help from the compiler. Er
David,
Thanks, as always, for your responsiveness. i don't know if you saw my
earlier post, but i found and fixed the problem. However, now i'm running
into a more subtle problem related to how the JSRaw is handled. See below.
Best wishes,
--greg
Here's the error according to firebug
F50765186
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Meredith Gregory wrote:
> David,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, but no joy. The error is the same. BTW, the only
> difference i could spot between your proposal and mine was changing the
> "-->" to "->".
>
Yeah... that was the difference.
Can you send me breaki
Lifted,
Sorry for the sound and fury. i found the soln again: the following call had
gotten mangled in boot
LiftRules.addToPackages("com.biosimilarity.weather")
That's a nasty one to get wrong. No help from the compiler. Error message
completely misleading.
Best wishes,
--greg
On Wed, Apr 29,
Lifted,
It appears that the interface for binding a namespace is side-effecting.
That's fine. But, i can't seem to understand the semantics. For example,
- if one puts a call to bind at the beginning of a block for a method
that handles a post, and yet returns a different nodeseq, the desir
David,
Thanks for the suggestion, but no joy. The error is the same. BTW, the only
difference i could spot between your proposal and mine was changing the
"-->" to "->".
Best wishes,
--greg
XML Parsing Error: prefix not bound to a namespace
Location: http://localhost:8080/AJAXREPLForm
Line Numb
Try:
def show(xhtml: NodeSeq): NodeSeq = {
{
bind( "hello", xhtml,
"initialTimeField" -> text("Nil", (updateInitialTime _)) % ("size" ->
"60") % ("id" -> "initialTimeField"),
"finalTimeField" -> text("Nil", (updateFinalTime _)) % ("size" ->
"60") % ("id" -> "finalTimeFiel
