Ah! Thanks for making me feel slightly less stupid. I think I've been
bitten by it twice. Nice to know I'm not alone.
I agree that the few places I have to look to configure things, the better.
Chas.
Meredith Gregory wrote:
> Lifted,
>
> i definitely vote to get this feature somewhere in the
Lifted,
i definitely vote to get this feature somewhere in the backlog. i've been
bitten by this 3 times.
Best wishes,
--greg
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 7:18 AM, David Pollak wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Tim Perrett wrote:
>
>>
>> Agreed, that sounds pukka – I guess its dpp or
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Tim Perrett wrote:
>
> Agreed, that sounds pukka – I guess its dpp or marius who needs to
> make this call as we have a code freeze on for "new features"
This isn't going to happen for 1.0, but it's a good idea for 1.1.
>
>
> On Feb 18, 2:39 pm, Viktor Klang
Agreed, that sounds pukka – I guess its dpp or marius who needs to
make this call as we have a code freeze on for "new features"
On Feb 18, 2:39 pm, Viktor Klang wrote:
> We could add another method that takes a Package and then deprecate the one
> that takes a String?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 20
We could add another method that takes a Package and then deprecate the one
that takes a String?
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Tim Perrett wrote:
>
>
> This appears to be a trade off between marginal code verbosity and
> compile time checking... Viktor's solution could be the way to go
> howe
This appears to be a trade off between marginal code verbosity and
compile time checking... Viktor's solution could be the way to go
however - this would be a massive breaking change though, as this
would screw every lift app in existence!
Cheers, Tim
On Feb 18, 10:38 am, Viktor Klang wrote:
>
Ok, what about this:
Why not have addToPackages take an actual Package?
usage:
addToPackages(com.my.stuff.SomeClass.getPackage) ?
This would prevent stuff from breaking if you refactor/move some classes.
Worth thinking about?
Cheers,
Viktor
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Charles F. Munat
Ah! That was it. Forgot I changed the name of the app, and didn't change
it there. Thanks very much! That saved me a lot of trouble.
Chas.
Jean-Luc wrote:
> Is your LiftRules defined according to your snippet package ?
>
> Exemple of addToPackages rule for snippets in "org.ansoft.myapp.snippet
Is your LiftRules defined according to your snippet package ?
Exemple of addToPackages rule for snippets in "org.ansoft.myapp.snippet"
package :
LiftRules.addToPackages("org.ansoft.myapp")
Jean-Luc
2009/2/18 Charles F. Munat
>
> Everything starts fine, but when I try to go to the home page of
