[Lift] Re: Db4o Integration

2008-10-05 Thread efleming969
@bjarte and @charles Sure, I've been learning Scala for a few months now and was trying to create a wicket application with db4o and kept running into problems that I did not know how to solve in Scala. Since Lift is witten in Scala, I thought my learning curve could be about the same, so here

[Lift] Simple Build Tool

2008-10-05 Thread Tim Perrett
Guys, Check this out: http://code.google.com/p/simple-build-tool/ It appeared a couple of days ago - im wondering if its something we could customize to make starting lift projects easier? Its all written in scala so should be easily extendable. I need to take a better look, but thought id

[Lift] expired sessions and log in

2008-10-05 Thread Charles F. Munat
I'm working on an app in which users may spend significant time editing a form before submitting it. It's possible during this time that their session could time out. My concern is that they might submit a long edit, discover that their session has timed out, log in, and lose the edit. (They

[Lift] Re: Simple Build Tool

2008-10-05 Thread TylerWeir
Looks interesting. I subscribed to the list to keep an eye on it. Ty On Oct 5, 1:59 pm, Tim Perrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys, Check this out: http://code.google.com/p/simple-build-tool/ It appeared a couple of days ago - im wondering if its something we could customize to make

[Lift] Re: Simple Build Tool

2008-10-05 Thread Jorge Ortiz
I don't see a downside to providing an alternative build system to people who are very Maven-averse (as long as I don't have to maintain it!, heh) But yeah, replacing Maven at this point seems unwise, unless there are very compelling reasons. --j On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM, David

[Lift] Re: Simple Build Tool

2008-10-05 Thread David Pollak
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Tim Perrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys, Check this out: http://code.google.com/p/simple-build-tool/ It appeared a couple of days ago - im wondering if its something we could customize to make starting lift projects easier? Its all written in scala so

[Lift] Re: expired sessions and log in

2008-10-05 Thread Martin Ellis
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Charles F. Munat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm working on an app in which users may spend significant time editing a form before submitting it. It's possible during this time that their session could time out. My concern is that they might submit a long edit,

[Lift] Re: Simple Build Tool

2008-10-05 Thread David Bernard
I took a quick look at it. like make, ant, builr the main issue I've got with it's it require scala to be installed and to don't manage the version of scala use to build you're project. And I suspect it could only build scala-project that used the same version as the tools itself. But I pro a

[Lift] Re: expired sessions and log in

2008-10-05 Thread David Pollak
See net.liftweb.mapper.ProtoExtendedSession This does not address the issue of the opaque identifiers used to map from form fields to functions. On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Tim Perrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Indeed - me and Ty were just talking about this incidentally, and there is no

[Lift] Re: Db4o Integration

2008-10-05 Thread David Pollak
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:27 AM, efleming969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: @bjarte and @charles Sure, I've been learning Scala for a few months now and was trying to create a wicket application with db4o and kept running into problems that I did not know how to solve in Scala. Since Lift is

[Lift] Re: Simple Build Tool

2008-10-05 Thread Derek Chen-Becker
There's no *requirement* to use all of the -D stuff. If you just do mvn -U archetype:generate you actually get a nice list of archetypes, two of which are: 31: internal - lift-archetype-blank (A blank/empty liftweb project) 32: internal - lift-archetype-basic (The basic (liftweb) project) If

[Lift] Re: expired sessions and log in

2008-10-05 Thread David Pollak
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Charles F. Munat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So if I understand you correctly, I would keep the session open indefinitely, but implement a time-out that forced the user to log in again after a certain period of inactivity? I see how that way I could maintain the

[Lift] Re: expired sessions and log in

2008-10-05 Thread Charles F. Munat
Hmmm. That's an idea and I'm not averse to it. I'll think about it some more. Thanks, Chas. David Pollak wrote: On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Charles F. Munat [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So if I understand you correctly, I would keep the session open