Just found a bug with the MSSQL drivers... Looks like its all working
fine, but on boot I see this with the schemifier:
Like I say, it works (the app that is) but having this stack trace on
boot is not nice. Any ideas?
INFO - CREATE TABLE modifiers (name VARCHAR(100) , id BIGINT IDENTITY
NOT
0.11 isn't released the correct version number is 0.11-SNAPSHOT
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:35, Tim Perrett he...@timperrett.com wrote:
0.10 is the current RELEASE that can be found in the
http://scala-tools.org/repo-releases
repo.
0.11 is the current DEV that can be found in
I deployed an app to a Jetty instance on my server and suddenly started
having problems with javax.transactions. I have the following in my pom:
dependency
groupIdorg.hibernate/groupId
artifactIdhibernate-entitymanager/artifactId
version3.3.1.ga/version
exclusions
exclusion
Sorry my bad - I should have pointed that out.
On Feb 12, 12:31 pm, David Bernard david.bernard...@gmail.com wrote:
0.11 isn't released the correct version number is 0.11-SNAPSHOT
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Tim, David,
Thanks!
Best wishes,
--greg
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Tim Perrett he...@timperrett.com wrote:
Sorry my bad - I should have pointed that out.
On Feb 12, 12:31 pm, David Bernard david.bernard...@gmail.com wrote:
0.11 isn't released the correct version number is
The defaultSchemaName fix for the SqlServerDriver is checked in.
Please let me know if that fixes the startup stacktrace you were
seeing.
On Feb 12, 6:48 am, alm4x1...@gmail.com alm4x1...@gmail.com wrote:
I have some patches to Schemifier that were not ready by the 1.0
freeze.
I tracked this
Lifted,
Suppose i've got the following fragment of lift tags
lift:surround with=default at=content
!-- Begin Easy Widgets plugin HTML markup --
div
a onclick=AddWidget('widget1.html'); return false
href=# title=Add an activity align=right+ Create an activity/a
/div
...
Tim,
Essentially, i want every request for http://localhost:8080 to start up a
new session. This should force login each time.
Best wishes,
--greg
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Tim Perrett he...@timperrett.com wrote:
Can you clarify what you mean by instance? You mean run jetty on
Greg,
If each HTTP request to localhost had a new session, what would happen when
you log in?
If you can tell me a little more about your use case, I'll work on a
solution.
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Meredith Gregory
lgreg.mered...@gmail.comwrote:
Tim,
Essentially, i
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Meredith Gregory
lgreg.mered...@gmail.comwrote:
Lifted,
Suppose i've got the following fragment of lift tags
lift:surround with=default at=content
!-- Begin Easy Widgets plugin HTML markup --
div
a onclick=AddWidget('widget1.html'); return false
David,
This is merely demoware -- nothing deployable. i simply need the following
behavior
- get http://localhost:8080 provides a login page (always)
- login sets up the session so that subsequent req's of the form
http://localhost:8080/mumble-with-session-info provide access to that
This might be a stupid suggestion, but cant you just use two different
browsers to be logged in with two users at the same time?
Im guessing you want to demo some kind of comet behavior or similar
between two users?
Tim
On Feb 12, 5:25 pm, Meredith Gregory lgreg.mered...@gmail.com wrote:
Tim,
That's a great idea. That's exactly what i want to do. Now, we're back to my
initial report. Whoops! i must have used Firefox for both localhost requests
before. If i use FF and Safari i get the behavior i wanted. Nevermind. ;-(
Best wishes,
--greg
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Tim
David,
Thanks for your on-going support! From the looks of your example, i'm
guessing that if i want to subsequently call some JavaScript to provide
visual feedback of the server-side behavior i do something more interesting
than the js.JsCmds.Noop in your code. However, i can't see exactly what
Jorge,
thanks a lot for that (I especially like the JQuery 1.3.1 update).
Is it possible to update to the latest blueprint css version? 0.8 was released
2009-02-06. I noticed some type/font problem in Opera with the version shipped
with Lift.
Joachim
I've upgraded the dependencies for all
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Joachim A. wallaby.po...@googlemail.comwrote:
Jorge,
thanks a lot for that (I especially like the JQuery 1.3.1 update).
Yeah, jQuery 1.31 is an awesome upgrade.
Love working with it :-)
Is it possible to update to the latest blueprint css version? 0.8
import js._
import JsCmds._
SHtml.a(() = {Alert(Hi Greg)}, Text(Create an activity))
div id=here/div
SHtml.a(() = {SetHtml(here, bHi Greg/b)}, Text(Create an activity))
SetHtml can put something on the page, no matter how complex that something
is.
For example, you could replace bHi Greg/b
Jesus! You have been busy Jorge! Kudos my good man :-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Lift group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Oh by the way, the Jquery update bring speed improvements im guessing
- has anyone tested / tried the comet stuff with 1.31? Just wondering
if we'll see any noticeable speed improvement?
Cheers
Tim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
Basically 1.3.x is bringing a new selector engine to the table, plus some
new cool features like live-events and some performance-tweaks with html()
etc.
But the release-docs are all up on the nice looking jquery.com site :)
So basically the selector-stuff will be faster in the general app. :)
You're right, I completely forgot about Blueprint and YUI. I'll get those
right away.
Although it seems like the latest version of Blueprint still has issues with
Opera, IE 6, and IE 5.5 (!!!). See:
http://wiki.github.com/joshuaclayton/blueprint-css/browser-compatibility-list
--j
On Thu, Feb
I thought their had been a cull of all IE5 users? ;-)
On Feb 12, 7:58 pm, Jorge Ortiz jorge.or...@gmail.com wrote:
Although it seems like the latest version of Blueprint still has issues with
Opera, IE 6, and IE 5.5 (!!!).
I don't know if this is related, but my Lift pages do not display in IE8
unless I click the broken page button. A run through the HTML
validator produces the following:
Line 42, Column 62: there is no attribute lift:gc.
…ber name=F743081847476BRR lift:gc=F743081847476BRR type=text
size=24
Is this true for Google Chrome, too? (Probably, although each tab is a
wholly separate process, I hear.)
Chas.
David Pollak wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Meredith Gregory
lgreg.mered...@gmail.com mailto:lgreg.mered...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
This is merely
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com wrote:
Is this true for Google Chrome, too? (Probably, although each tab is a
wholly separate process, I hear.)
They share cookies between the processes unless you're browsing Incognito.
Chas.
David Pollak wrote:
Ok, two more upgrades. Do note that Blueprint changed it's directory layout.
If you're using the CSS.Blueprint / snippet you should be fine though.
Blueprint CSS
0.6 - 0.8
YUI
2.5.1 - 2.6.0
--j
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Jorge Ortiz jorge.or...@gmail.com wrote:
You're right, I
Folks,
After some digging, it appears that the lift:gc problem is a jQuery and/or
Firefox issue. jQuery BlockUI creates a div that contains the dialog.
For some reason, that div does not seem to get the namespace attributes of
the current document (I don't know if this is a jQuery problem in
Awesome stuff.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Jorge Ortiz jorge.or...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, two more upgrades. Do note that Blueprint changed it's directory
layout. If you're using the CSS.Blueprint / snippet you should be fine
though.
Blueprint CSS
0.6 - 0.8
YUI
2.5.1 - 2.6.0
--j
Damn Jorge, nice stuff. Comprehensive.
On Feb 12, 1:50 pm, Jorge Ortiz jorge.or...@gmail.com wrote:
I've upgraded the dependencies for all of the Lift components and sample
projects. I used the latest backward-compatible version that was available
on public Maven repositories. (See below for
Good to know.
David Pollak wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Charles F. Munat c...@munat.com
mailto:c...@munat.com wrote:
Is this true for Google Chrome, too? (Probably, although each tab is a
wholly separate process, I hear.)
They share cookies between the
Thanks for all the help and support over the last few months. During
that time, I've developed several
Lift applications that are now successfully running in production at
the company I work for.
One of the things that has impressed me is the community spirit of the
group. I've had pretty much
Oliver,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Oliver ola...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for all the help and support over the last few months. During
that time, I've developed several
Lift applications that are now successfully running in production at
the company I work for.
Awesome.
One of
Awesome!
Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:07 PM, etorreborre etorrebo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to announce a new specs release, 1.4.3.
This release fixes the following issues:
-issue 50: subexamples reporting
-issue 51, 53: behave like is not working
-issue 55: beIn,
Folks,
The code for Lift 0.11-SNAPSHOT (aka, Lift 1.0 RC) is frozen.
The only changes to the Lift codebase between now and 2/26, the 1.0 release
date, will be bug fixes.
Please test, test, test, test, test the 0.11-SNAPSHOT release.
I checked in some browser compatibility fixes today (making
I presume that I'm still okay to commit all of the scaladoc updates I've
been working on? I'll probably have all of lift-utils (with the exception
of the parser combinator stuff which I don't understand) fully documented
either tonight or tomorrow morning, with lift-webkit soon to follow.
Kris
If you could that would be great!
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Jorge Ortiz jorge.or...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the projects I keep putting off is to extract Lift's templating
system into a component that could be used as a stand-alone library. If this
is something you'd be interested
Kris,
Anything that does not change code is fine.
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Kris Nuttycombe
kris.nuttyco...@gmail.comwrote:
I presume that I'm still okay to commit all of the scaladoc updates I've
been working on? I'll probably have all of lift-utils (with the exception
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 05:43, Oliver ola...@gmail.com wrote:
If you could that would be great!
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Jorge Ortiz jorge.or...@gmail.com
wrote:
One of the projects I keep putting off is to extract Lift's templating
system into a component that could be used
I have a site that runs fine on my local machine using jetty:run.
I load it into a Jetty instance on the server, and I get the error
below. Same code, same page. Same servlet container.
What's more, several other sites use basically the same code.
Anybody got any clue? It's not finding
39 matches
Mail list logo
