How would one go about having dynamic description and keyword meta
tags in a template? Here is what i've tried:
default.html
meta name=descriptionb:meta_desc //meta
HelloWorld.scala
Helpers.bind(b, in, time - date.map(d = Text(d.toString)),
meta_desc - test desc)
I'm using a basic archetype
Hey,
First of all, let me take the complete opposite stance observed from
one of the most reason posts from a Rails Junkie. I'm very excited
to see a framework that takes the good from so many different projects
and houses it under a language that does the same. I find it
refreshing to have the
On Mar 6, 5:28 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Back in 2005-2006 Ruby and Rails were not easy to
get started with.
My first Rails checkins in our VCS are from 2004. I had no trouble at
all getting things running back then and don't remember hearing a lot
of complaints
We are currently on version 2.0-M3. Its stable, and production ready... we keep
our snapshots very stable and you shouldnt get any problems using it.
Cheers, Tim
On 7 Mar 2010, at 03:10, Martin wrote:
I notice the last production quality release was over a year ago; I do
notice there have
Business wise, rails / php etc are not even on the same scale as lift. Rails /
PHP etc are cheap, easy ways to deploy *sites*. Lift is for building serious
*web applications*. there is a distinct difference... and yes, for these
reasons no doubt the higher cost of deployment will scare some
If there's no rational reason to use Lift, then perhaps you could find
another community to spend your time in.
I didn't say that there was no rational reason to use Lift BUT THAT YOU ARE
FAILING TO COMMUNICATE WHAT THAT REASON MIGHT BE TO POTENTIAL USERS! You
can't expect potential users to
Note, it is very easy to clean up the JSON before rendering by using
'map' function:
json map {
case JString(s) = JString(sripOutBinaryChars(s))
case x = x
}
(You just need to implement that sripOutBinaryChars function...).
Cheers Joni
On Mar 5, 8:26 pm, Dano olearydani...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
Looking at Js api and specifically JsCmds and JqJsCmds (the Js
abstractions vs Jquery specify abstractions) IMHO there are several
redundancies:
1. JsCmds has ~ method for referencing member of objects (i.e
elem.focus()) but JQuery abstractions have method that chains a
JQueryLeft
Marius,
I think this sounds like a great idea - but I only have 2 Lift projects under
development so it would be quite fast for me to make any changes
Mads
On 07/03/2010, at 19.37, Marius wrote:
Dear all,
Looking at Js api and specifically JsCmds and JqJsCmds (the Js
abstractions vs
My model classes mix-in IdPK and have the following boiler-plate for
equals and hashCode:
class Team extends LongKeyedMapper[Team] with IdPK {
override def equals (other : Any) = other match {
case t : Team if t.id.is == this.id.is = true
case _ = false
}
override def
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:54 AM, hexa hex...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to do something which should be simple I think .. passing
a function to toForm like so :
class AddClient {
def add (inhtml: NodeSeq) : NodeSeq = {
val client = Client.create
def processEntry () = {
Good idea. Please open a ticket at
https://liftweb.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets and assign it to me.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:57 AM, aw anth...@whitford.com wrote:
My model classes mix-in IdPK and have the following boiler-plate for
equals and hashCode:
class Team extends
Jonathan, your comments are someplace between not helpful and troll-like.
It'd be best if you did not continue to participate in this thread.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:36 AM, jonathan mawson umpti...@gmail.com wrote:
If there's no rational reason to use Lift, then perhaps you could find
I'm not sure about the fastness as I also have other things and a 4
days baby boy ;) ... but I think this is fairly important and I'll try
to prioritize.
On Mar 7, 8:52 pm, Mads Hartmann Jensen mads...@gmail.com wrote:
Marius,
I think this sounds like a great idea - but I only have 2 Lift
Can it be changed with a deprecation phase?
-
Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure about the fastness as I also have other things and a 4
days baby boy ;) ... but I think this is fairly important and I'll try
to prioritize.
On Mar 7, 8:52 pm,
I think that Jonathan was impolite in expressing his frustration at being
misunderstood.
But are his points not valuable?
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Jonathan, your comments are someplace between not helpful and troll-like.
It'd be best
Yes that's the idea ... I apologize I didn't actually mean to just
remove things out of the sudden. But I'll know more once I get to dig
deeper.
On Mar 7, 10:13 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote:
Can it be changed with a deprecation phase?
-
Then it sounds good to me, although that doesn't count as much since I must
admit I haven't really had the opportunity to use Lift's ajax and javascript
parts.
-
Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes that's the idea ... I apologize I didn't actually mean
You must be unique :)
On Mar 7, 10:21 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote:
Then it sounds good to me, although that doesn't count as much since I must
admit I haven't really had the opportunity to use Lift's ajax and javascript
parts.
-
Based on discussion on Review Board item 247, I want to propose the following
change to the organization of Mapper specs.
Currently there are four files in
framework/lift-persistence/lift-mapper/src/test/scala/net/liftweb/mapper:
DBProviders - initalization for each provider to be tested
I may have a project coming up that would use it though. :)
-
Mariusmarius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
You must be unique :)
On Mar 7, 10:21 pm, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote:
Then it sounds good to me, although that doesn't count as much since I
Done. Issue 408. Thanks!
https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/408-add-equals-and-hashcode-to-idpk-trait
On Mar 7, 11:53 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Good idea. Please open a ticket
athttps://liftweb.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/ticketsand assign it to me.
Is there any objection to
https://www.assembla.com/spaces/liftweb/tickets/411 - MappedLongForeignKey
should call primeObj in apply(v: O) and apply(v: Box[O])?
In other words, if you set a MappedLongForeignKey by passing it a Mapper
instance of the referenced table, is there any reason not to cache
To be parsed by the bind, it must be enclosed by
lift:HelloWorld.hello.../lift:HelloWorld.hello
There is relatively little magic -- Lift goes through your template looking for
lift: prefixed tags. For those tags, it will look up a snippet class by using
the part before the period (HelloWorld,
Thank you Ross, for the very informative response!
Now, I consider SEO to be closer to a designer task than a developer task so
keeping the power in the design documents would be my best idea. Is there
anyway to allow individual pages to define blocks that are read into the
snippets and then
It's not necessary. Just put a head section in the template and it will be
combined with the head section in default.html.
-
Martin Dale Lynessmartin.lyn...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Ross, for the very informative response!
Now, I consider SEO to be closer
On Mar 4, 9:50 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:27 AM, aw anth...@whitford.com wrote:
On Mar 4, 6:56 am, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.com wrote:
How about
LiftRules.stripComments.default.set( () = !Req.isIE)
etc.?
This is where
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
I think that Jonathan was impolite in expressing his frustration at being
misunderstood.
First, don't you think that it's ironic that someone who was trying to teach
us about marketing was so incapable of expressing
What's wrong with KeyedMapper's implementation?
Well, that was exactly why I was asking the question, Is this
implementation for equals and hashCode a good idea? I had gotten
this at some point, been using it, and am only questioning it now
because if it truly is a good idea, I think it should
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Martin martin.lyn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
First of all, let me take the complete opposite stance observed from
one of the most reason posts from a Rails Junkie. I'm very excited
to see a framework that takes the good from so many different projects
and
On 7 March 2010 19:37, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
If you think that this makes sense I'll add a ticket and put it in my
backlog.
Makes a lot of sense for me. Go for it!
Heiko
Company: weiglewilczek.com
Blog: heikoseeberger.name
Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger
OSGi on Scala:
31 matches
Mail list logo